2020
DOI: 10.31005/iajmh.v3i0.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Glyphosate in human urine from farmers in Mato Grosso-BR

Abstract: This study was conducted based on the evaluation of glyphosate levels present in rural workers in the region of Nova Mutum-MT. We analyzed 90 urine samples from farmers between 2017 and 2018. The samples were analyzed based on the development of the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-FL) method. The results showed that 12% of the farmers presented glyphosate levels, but that the highest concentration determined by the method used was not above the limits allowed by Brazilian regulators. The HPLC-FL m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study carried out in the state of Mato Grosso, in the Nova Mutum region, analyzed 90 urine samples from farmers between 2017 and 2018 and 12% of these samples had glyphosate levels. The methodology used in the analyzes was performed by HPLC-FL and the detected values ranged from 0.34 and 1.15 ppb (Melo et al, 2020). Glyphosate has been detected in urine samples from people exposed to this active ingredient in countries other than Brazil (Cannolly et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study carried out in the state of Mato Grosso, in the Nova Mutum region, analyzed 90 urine samples from farmers between 2017 and 2018 and 12% of these samples had glyphosate levels. The methodology used in the analyzes was performed by HPLC-FL and the detected values ranged from 0.34 and 1.15 ppb (Melo et al, 2020). Glyphosate has been detected in urine samples from people exposed to this active ingredient in countries other than Brazil (Cannolly et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%