Reactive Flows, Diffusion and Transport
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28396-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Kinetic Parameters in Laminar Flow Reactors. I. Theoretical Aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), taken to be the averaged value mentioned earlier, from several self-consistent measurements in the 1970s, λ C = 0.145 ± 0.015 μs −1 (at 50 bar). This also agrees well with a much more recently reported value [61]. Nevertheless, the fact remains that there is a considerable level of disagreement in published values for this rate.…”
Section: Musupporting
confidence: 92%
“…2), taken to be the averaged value mentioned earlier, from several self-consistent measurements in the 1970s, λ C = 0.145 ± 0.015 μs −1 (at 50 bar). This also agrees well with a much more recently reported value [61]. Nevertheless, the fact remains that there is a considerable level of disagreement in published values for this rate.…”
Section: Musupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These values, along with λ b , were determined from a fit to the laser-off data (Figure , top) and then fixed in fitting S ( t ). The collisional relaxation rate λ C was fixed at 0.145 μs –1 at 50 bar, from an average of several measurements , (uncertainty ±0.015 μs –1 ). The parameter f accounts for the overlap between the laser profile (region of pumped H 2 ) and the muon stopping distribution and was determined independently by integrating this overlap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes an estimation after substituting the unknown continuous solutions with computable quantities. As shown in several applications [9,30,29,26,10,5] one efficient method to produce computable quantities is the use of a patch-wise higher-order approximation of the terms z h and w h . In particular, we have used the following interpolation operator with…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%