“…Several analytical methods such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) 13,14,17 , proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) 1 , inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) 18,19 , two-jet plasma atomic emission spectrometry 20 , inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) alone 2,11,12,21 or combined with laser ablation (LA-ICP-MS) 9,22 , hydride generation (HG-ICP-MS) 23 , atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) 24 or electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) 1, 3,6,12,15,16,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] previously assessed the validity and limitations for the purpose of quantification of Pb in both human and animal samples. Among these methods, ETAAS 1, 5,10,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36] still represents the most commonly used one in routine analytical practice because of its high sensitivity, favourable detection limits and relatively low cost of the instrumentation. However, due to the complex matrix, laborious sample preparation, relatively low analytical concentration and high volatility of some lead species, the analysis of bone or teeth samples is difficult 1, 33,34,37 .…”