2001
DOI: 10.1039/b100076o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of linezolid in human plasma by LC-MS-MS

Abstract: A rapid, sensitive and selective LC-atmospheric pressure-chemical ionization-MS-MS method for the determination of the new antimicrobial agent, linezolid, in human plasma using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) was developed. Linezolid and the internal standard were extracted from the biological samples by solid phase extraction (SPE) and analyzed on a reversed-phase Shim Pack CLC-CN, C18 column with the mobile phase of acetonitrile and 20 mM ammonium acetate solution (4 + 1 v/v). Detection was accomplished u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reports on the assay of linezolid in human plasma (Peng et al, 1999;Phillips et al, 2001), serum (Borner et al, 2001;Ehrlich et al, 2001;Tobin et al, 2001) and urine (Borner et al, 2001;Ehrlich et al, 2001). However, these methods have some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several reports on the assay of linezolid in human plasma (Peng et al, 1999;Phillips et al, 2001), serum (Borner et al, 2001;Ehrlich et al, 2001;Tobin et al, 2001) and urine (Borner et al, 2001;Ehrlich et al, 2001). However, these methods have some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, none of these methods employed an internal standard to prevent possible errors which may occur during sample pre-treatment and injections. The reported methods (Peng et al, 1999;Phillips et al, 2001) employing solid-phase extraction (SPE) had much longer sample pre-treatment duration due to the conditioning of SPE cartridges and evaporation of organic solvent, which make these methods time-consuming when assaying a large number of samples. In addition, the LC-MS assay (Phillips et al, 2001) did not improve the lowest limit of quantification (0.10 mg/L) obtained with the ultraviolet detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, analysis by mass spectrometry results in lower background noise, higher sensitivity and fewer drugmetabolite interferences compared with other analytical methods (Turpeinen and Stenman, 2003;Wallemacq et al, 2003;Ballesteros et al, 2003). Analysis by LC-MS-MS generally exhibits sensitivity in the range of 10 −6 -10 −12 g/mL plasma (Xia et al, 1999;Zhu et al, 2002;Phillips et al, 2001). The utility of LC-MS-MS has been demonstrated in the analysis of many classes of drugs including antibiotics (Ballesteros et al, 2003), antidepressants (Naidong and Eerkes, 2004), and hypoglycemics (Lin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to use the LTQ for PIM assays and quantification on a 96-well microtiter plate. A limited number of studies have used the LCQ (an earlier version of LTQ) in SRM mode to determine the levels of certain drugs in plasma, [18][19][20][21] and some have attempted to examine the ability of a linear ion trap (LTQ) to quantitate peptides in serum in SRM mode. 11,16,17,22 PSA was chosen as the model protein since it can be obtained in a purified form, and an excellent immunoassay is available to validate the mass spectrometry data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%