2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934809030083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of low atomic number elements by X-ray fluorescence fundamental parameter method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamental parameter (FP) methods were extended to the analysis of Z < 10 elements and in situ excitation geometry by Pavlinskii and Vladimirova. 61 They demonstrated that the ionisation of elements such as carbon and oxygen by photo-and Auger-electrons should be taken into account in the FP models when relevant. Pavlinskii et al 62 published another article on the contribution of the photoelectric effect, Auger-and Comptongenerated electrons to the bremsstrahlung radiation produced in the sample during irradiation by X-rays.…”
Section: Spectrum Analysis Matrix Correction and Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental parameter (FP) methods were extended to the analysis of Z < 10 elements and in situ excitation geometry by Pavlinskii and Vladimirova. 61 They demonstrated that the ionisation of elements such as carbon and oxygen by photo-and Auger-electrons should be taken into account in the FP models when relevant. Pavlinskii et al 62 published another article on the contribution of the photoelectric effect, Auger-and Comptongenerated electrons to the bremsstrahlung radiation produced in the sample during irradiation by X-rays.…”
Section: Spectrum Analysis Matrix Correction and Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, primary X‐ray techniques, such as X‐ray fluorescence—XRF, energy dispersive X‐ray scanning electron microscopy (EDX SEM), electron probe microanalysis, etc. (Pavlinskii & Vladimirova, 2009; Watkins et al, 2017) have relatively high limits of detection (LoDs) for light elements such as N, O, and F, which are mostly related to the high matrix effects (Pavlinskii & Vladimirova, 2009; An et al, 2012; Boča, Gurišová, & Šimko, 2017; Watkins et al, 2017). Energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy and electron energy‐loss spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy are unapplicable for the elemental levels below 0.1 at.% (Eswara et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for carbon with the primary radiation of X-ray tubes, this contribution can be as high as 60−80% of the total fluorescence intensity. Pavlinskii and Vladimirova performed FP-based XRF analysis of materials containing low- Z elements (fluorine, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, and boron). It was shown by the examples of carbon and oxygen that the account of C and O atom ionization by photo- and Auger electrons of the irradiated sample was obligatory.…”
Section: Quantification and Fundamental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%