2009
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-009-1249-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Melamine in Food by SPE and CZE with UV Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IC 50 value (50% inhibition) of melamine was 0.35 ng mL À1 with a LOD of 0.01 ng mL À1 (15% inhibition), which is close to that of GC/MS (Xu et al, 2009), LC-ESI-MS/MS (Ibánez et al, 2009) and electrochemical impedance spectrometry (Cao et al, 2009), lower than that of GC/MS , Abrixis ELISA (Garber, 2008), CZE-UV (Meng et al, 2009), UPLC/MS/MS (Cheng et al, 2009), ion-exchange LC-DAD , MIPs (Liang et al, 2009), sweeping-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (Tsai et al, 2009) and raman spectroscopy assay (Okazaki et al, 2009). Although the LOD of the method is higher than that of chemiluminescence method ), but clearly it is lower than the safety limit of melamine permitted by USA, EU and China (Ai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Calibration Curve Working Range and Limit Of Detectionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IC 50 value (50% inhibition) of melamine was 0.35 ng mL À1 with a LOD of 0.01 ng mL À1 (15% inhibition), which is close to that of GC/MS (Xu et al, 2009), LC-ESI-MS/MS (Ibánez et al, 2009) and electrochemical impedance spectrometry (Cao et al, 2009), lower than that of GC/MS , Abrixis ELISA (Garber, 2008), CZE-UV (Meng et al, 2009), UPLC/MS/MS (Cheng et al, 2009), ion-exchange LC-DAD , MIPs (Liang et al, 2009), sweeping-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (Tsai et al, 2009) and raman spectroscopy assay (Okazaki et al, 2009). Although the LOD of the method is higher than that of chemiluminescence method ), but clearly it is lower than the safety limit of melamine permitted by USA, EU and China (Ai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Calibration Curve Working Range and Limit Of Detectionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The recovery values were higher than that of Abrixis ELISA (Garber, 2008), GC/MS (Xu et al, 2009), LC-ESI-MS/MS (Ibánez et al, 2009) and DAPCI-MS (Yang et al, 2009), within the range of GC/MS ) and DAPCI-MS (Yang et al, 2009). Although the recovery values of the assay were lower than that of CZE-UV (Meng et al, 2009), UPLC/MS/MS (Cheng et al, 2009); electrochemical impedance spectrometry (Cao et al, 2009) and sweeping-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (Tsai et al, 2009), but it does not need complicated instrument. The spiked samples were also analysed by commercial method (GC-MS/MS).…”
Section: Extraction Recoverymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the determination of melamine, some methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (Xu et al 2009;Li et al 2009;Miao et al 2009;Ibánez et al 2009;Zhao et al 2010), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/MS (Xia et al 2009;Muñiz-Valencia et al 2008;Filigenzi et al 2007), capillary zone electrophoresis/MS (CE/MS or UV) (Karaseva et al 2003;Meng et al 2009;Klampfl et al 2009;Wen et al 2010), potentiometry (Liang et al 2009) and some electrochemical methods (Cao et al 2009(Cao et al , 2010Tsung-Hsuan et al 2010) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method suffers from poor sensitivity, due to short optical length and small sample volume. To overcome these problems, some researchers utilized liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction techniques for purifying and concentrating melamine from food samples prior to CE-UV analysis [14][15][16]. Additionally, the combination of an on-line concentration approach and CE-UV was employed to determine melamine in food products [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%