1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90192-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mutation rates in bacteriophage T4 by unneighborly base pairs: Genetic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these processes are potentially sequence dependent in their rate and extent. Indeed, the mutagenic action of (AP) at a given site can be strongly influenced by the identity of the nucleotides in the immediate vicinity (Coulondre et al, 1979) and even by single base pair changes at a considerable distance from the site (Conkling et al, 1980). Insofar as misincorporation of (AP) in vitro is concerned, its strong sequence dependence is documented by our earlier nearest-neighbor work (Pless et al, 1981) and, at a more detailed level, in the present report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…All of these processes are potentially sequence dependent in their rate and extent. Indeed, the mutagenic action of (AP) at a given site can be strongly influenced by the identity of the nucleotides in the immediate vicinity (Coulondre et al, 1979) and even by single base pair changes at a considerable distance from the site (Conkling et al, 1980). Insofar as misincorporation of (AP) in vitro is concerned, its strong sequence dependence is documented by our earlier nearest-neighbor work (Pless et al, 1981) and, at a more detailed level, in the present report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…At least in the cases of T4 (which lacks conventional DNA mismatch repair) and of DNA synthesis in vitro by various polymerases, the rate of formation and/or disposition of a mismatch during synthesis can reasonably be expected to vary as a function of its close neighbors, but the number of template and primer bases contacted by the polymerase and/or proofreading exonuclease is small, so the effects of more distant bases might be expected to extinguish quickly. It was therefore surprising to observe that a particular BPS increased mutation rates at sites separated from it by 11 and 12 intervening bases (Conkling et al 1980;Sugino and Drake 1984 as recently confirmed by unpublished results of G. T. Carver and J. W. Drake).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Because the frequency of multiple events is higher than can be explained by independent events, an alternative explanation is required. One possibility is that a lesion can disrupt DNA structure over an extended range, as in the "unneighborly" base-pairing effect seen by Conkling et al [54]. A second possibility is that there is an SOS-like mechanism for bypassing an adduct that involves a reduction in proofreading and hence multiple distant mutational events.…”
Section: Dmba-induced Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%