Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) of 924 fresh temperate forages were used to develop calibration models for chemical composition -crude ash (CA) and crude protein (CP) -organic matter digestibility (OMD) and voluntary intake (VI). We used 110 samples to assess the models. Four calibration strategies for determining forage quality were compared: (i) speciesspecific calibration, (ii) family-specific calibration, (iii) a global procedure and (iv) a local approach. Forage calibration data sets displayed CA values ranging from 52 to 205 g/kg of dry matter (DM), CP values from 50 to 280 g/kg DM, OMD values from 0.48 to 0.85 g/g and VI values from 22.5 to 115.2 g DM/kg metabolic body weight (BW 0.75 ). The calibration models performed well for all the variables except for VI. For CA, local procedure showed lower standard error of prediction (SEP) than species-specific, family-specific or global models. For CP, the calibration models all showed similar SEP values (11.13, 11.08, 11.38 and 11.34 g/kg DM for species-specific, family-specific, global and local approaches). For OMD, the local procedure gave a similar SEP (0.024 g/g) to specific species and global procedures (0.027 g/g) and a lower SEP than the family-specific approach (0.028 g/g). For VI, the local approach and species-specific calibration showed lower SEP (7.08 and 7.16 g/kg BW 0.75 ) than the broad-based calibrations (8.09 and 8.34 g/kg BW 0.75 for family-specific model and global procedure, respectively). Local calibration may thus offer a practical way to develop robust universal equations for animal response determinations.Keywords: chemical composition, in vivo organic matter digestibility, voluntary intake, near infrared reflectance spectroscopy
ImplicationsThis study evaluates the utility of different near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) calibration methods for predicting the feed value of fresh forages. We compare an alternative local approach with the more classical global approach. The local approach conserves all the advantages of NIRS technology (rapidity, non-contaminant technology and precision) and takes into account the number of samples and their diversity when large database are available. It overcomes the main limitation of NIRS, which is that the samples for prediction have to be close to those of the calibration population. The local approach could improve prediction of the nutritional value of feeds, and thus have important economic and environmental implications for animal nutrition.
IntroductionRuminant performance is closely related to the digestibility and intake of feedstuffs. In most countries, knowledge of the feed value of forages is based on in vivo measurements made in castrated male sheep (Demarquilly et al., 1995 for a review). However, the large-scale application of in vivo digestibility trials for evaluating forage feed value is an expensive and time-consuming process that requires large amounts of feeds. As knowing these values is essential for controlled animal feeding, several methods have been d...