2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of nitrogen reduction levels necessary to reach groundwater quality targets in Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje je v sodelovanju z nemškim raziskovalnim središčem JÜLICH za območje celotne Slovenije prilagodila modelski sistem GROWA--DENUZ/WEKU (Kunkel & Wendland, 2006;Wendland et al, 2008), ki poleg bilance vode upošteva bilanco dušika ter modelira tok dušika preko tal in vodonosnika v površinska vodna telesa. Za prvo oceno zanesljivosti rezultatov tega kompleksnega modelskega sistem smo na območju plitvega aluvialnega vodonosnika Spodnje Savinjske doline s podzemno vodo v slabem kemijskem stanju izdelali primerjalno analizo rezultatov regionalnega modeliranja toka dušika preko koreninskega območja tal GROWA-DENUZ (Kunkel & Wendland, 2006;Andjelov et al, 2014Andjelov et al, , 2015 in rezultatov lokalnega modela toka dušika iz koreninskega območja tal DNDC (Li et al, 1992) v posameznih talnih profilih. Zanimala nas je stopnja ujemanja modelskih rezultatov v lokalnem in regionalnem merilu v izbranem letu 2008, ko so bile opravljene tudi obsežne terenske meritve, laboratorijske analize in študijske raziskave (Uhan, 2011), ter primernost uporabe modelskega sistema GROWA-DENUZ/WEKU za potrebe simuliranja učinkov ukrepov v smeri izboljšanja kemijskega stanja podzemnih voda.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje je v sodelovanju z nemškim raziskovalnim središčem JÜLICH za območje celotne Slovenije prilagodila modelski sistem GROWA--DENUZ/WEKU (Kunkel & Wendland, 2006;Wendland et al, 2008), ki poleg bilance vode upošteva bilanco dušika ter modelira tok dušika preko tal in vodonosnika v površinska vodna telesa. Za prvo oceno zanesljivosti rezultatov tega kompleksnega modelskega sistem smo na območju plitvega aluvialnega vodonosnika Spodnje Savinjske doline s podzemno vodo v slabem kemijskem stanju izdelali primerjalno analizo rezultatov regionalnega modeliranja toka dušika preko koreninskega območja tal GROWA-DENUZ (Kunkel & Wendland, 2006;Andjelov et al, 2014Andjelov et al, , 2015 in rezultatov lokalnega modela toka dušika iz koreninskega območja tal DNDC (Li et al, 1992) v posameznih talnih profilih. Zanimala nas je stopnja ujemanja modelskih rezultatov v lokalnem in regionalnem merilu v izbranem letu 2008, ko so bile opravljene tudi obsežne terenske meritve, laboratorijske analize in študijske raziskave (Uhan, 2011), ter primernost uporabe modelskega sistema GROWA-DENUZ/WEKU za potrebe simuliranja učinkov ukrepov v smeri izboljšanja kemijskega stanja podzemnih voda.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Or they are principal for groundwater quality studies, when groundwater is a relevant pathway for pollution, e.g. Tetzlaff et al (2013a, b), Andjelov et al (2014), Celen et al (2014, Kuhr et al (2013), Zupanc et al (2011. In any case, scientists and practitioners involved in large scale investigations have to cope with data scarcity problems, especially for soil and geological parameters, while precipitation, land use and elevation data are already available at high resolution, at least for most European regions.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Model-based Groundwater Assessments At Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GROWA model results are used for issues related to practical water resources management, e.g. the granting of permits to abstract groundwater on a regional level and for status reviews of groundwater bodies according to the EU WFD (Tetzlaff and Wendland 2008;Tetzlaff et al 2009c) or to simulate runoff as a prerequisite for nutrient transport modelling (Tetzlaff and Wendland 2012;Tetzlaff et al 2013a;Andjelov et al 2014).…”
Section: Environ Earth Scimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, is nitrogen in these areas together with the plant protection products the main groundwater pollutant? Coincidence of natural geological and climate conditions, development in agriculture production management and past inappropriate decisions by authorities caused that many of drinking groundwater sources are at a high risk or even not suitable for use [6]. While Slovenia assigns the whole country as nitrate-vulnerable zone by Nitrate Directive and almost all farmers implemented Codes of Good Agricultural Practice, areas of additional special protection of drinking water groundwater resources are defined as water protection areas (WPAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%