2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of okadaic acid in shellfish by using a novel chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this assay is not truly rapid (i.e. TAT of less than 1 h) and requires numerous reagent additions and wash steps, incubations, trained personnel and dedicated equipment for the measurement of results [ 26 29 ]. Other systems for toxin detection use the same competitive format principle, but have improved read-out or incorporate high-density spotting in a microarray format [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Detection Of Marine Biotoxins In Shellfishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assay is not truly rapid (i.e. TAT of less than 1 h) and requires numerous reagent additions and wash steps, incubations, trained personnel and dedicated equipment for the measurement of results [ 26 29 ]. Other systems for toxin detection use the same competitive format principle, but have improved read-out or incorporate high-density spotting in a microarray format [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Detection Of Marine Biotoxins In Shellfishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, LC-MS/MS has been established as the official EU detection method [ 22 ]. The immunoassay technique uses the specific binding between antigen and antibody to detect the analyte, which has high specificity, high sensitivity, and wide application; thus, it is an important technical method for the detection of shellfish toxin OA [ 23 , 24 ]. The commonly used screening detection methods include ELISA, time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA), and other similar techniques; ELISA has been widely used in the study of OA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of this method are the requirements for highly qualified personnel, enormous sample cleanup, and costly equipment. Recently, immunological analysis methods have been investigated as emerging screening tools for OA because they are rapid, simple and cost effective [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Nevertheless, the preparation of the monoclonal antibody is very expensive and time consuming, and the procedure requires the continued use of animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%