1995
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1995.9976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Optimally Resolving Gel Concentration and Migration Time (Path) in Gel Electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the LiCor 4300 DNA Analysis System (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE), should be suitable for protein analysis as well with an adaptation of the gel cassette to short separation distances, and using appropriate protein labeling dyes matching the specific excitation laser wavelength. However, with DNA sequencers a sample recovery is not possible, in contrast to specifically developed instruments like the HPGE-1000 (LabIntelligence, Menlo Park, CA) [37][38][39] and the Pharmacia PhastSystem (GE Healthcare). On the other hand, the capacity of these instruments is limited to 8 samples per run for the HPGE-1000 and 12 samples per gel (2 gels per run) for the PhastSystem, and the latter instrument does not provide online detection capability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the LiCor 4300 DNA Analysis System (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE), should be suitable for protein analysis as well with an adaptation of the gel cassette to short separation distances, and using appropriate protein labeling dyes matching the specific excitation laser wavelength. However, with DNA sequencers a sample recovery is not possible, in contrast to specifically developed instruments like the HPGE-1000 (LabIntelligence, Menlo Park, CA) [37][38][39] and the Pharmacia PhastSystem (GE Healthcare). On the other hand, the capacity of these instruments is limited to 8 samples per run for the HPGE-1000 and 12 samples per gel (2 gels per run) for the PhastSystem, and the latter instrument does not provide online detection capability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in some previous applications of that procedure more than a single electroelution step was required to obtain a nearquantitative disappearance of the protein peak of interest from the pattern (e.g. [11]). In application to rGFP, a single electroelution step sufficed for near-disappearance of the peak from the pattern.…”
Section: Electroeluatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,10,11,14]). However, the disappearance of the fluorescent band from the gel pattern does not, by itself, guarantee the arrival of the electroeluted protein in the electroeluate buffer since (i) the protein may be located in the 100 mL of gel plugging the elution cup; (ii) the protein after migration into the electroeluate buffer may be damaged and/or its fluorophore lost, unless that buffer is periodically renewed.…”
Section: Critical Electroelution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for using the discontinuous Tris-Tricinate buffer system are specified in [12]. The buffer system is also the one that has been applied in the protein separations, using the HPGE apparatus, from its inception [1,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and in previous work on the transfer of proteins from gel electrophoretic bands into MS [4,6].…”
Section: Buffermentioning
confidence: 99%