2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey's different degree-day regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average differences for May are 1.34%, 3.26%, 1.49% and 0.87% for DDRs from 1 to 4 respectively. The average differences for June are 15 Windows on east and west facades are very similar and not as effective as south facades in reducing the buildings heating energy requirements in heating period. Because long nights and short daytime, prevent these surfaces from warming up.…”
Section: Findings and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average differences for May are 1.34%, 3.26%, 1.49% and 0.87% for DDRs from 1 to 4 respectively. The average differences for June are 15 Windows on east and west facades are very similar and not as effective as south facades in reducing the buildings heating energy requirements in heating period. Because long nights and short daytime, prevent these surfaces from warming up.…”
Section: Findings and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Generally, the other previous studies performed on TS 825 were based on determination of optimum insulation thicknesses for different degree day regions. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Aksoy and Bektaş Ekici [5] investigated the appropriateness of climatic data given in TS 825 for different DDRs with different building samples.…”
Section: Due To Its Geographical Position Between 36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When short calculation times are assumed, the optimum lies between 6 and 9 cm [17], [18], [19]. When longer time periods are considered, the optimum is between 10 and 20 cm.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have explored the cost-effectiveness of EWI by measuring the initial cost of installation against subsequent energy savings [22]; its financial and environmental benefits [23,24] have also been considered, as have the effectiveness of different types of materials for EWI [25], and optimal EWI thickness [23], both of which may vary from place to place according to local climate [26]. The Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT) (2008-2012) and Community Energy Saving Programme (CESP) (2009-2012) programmes, which obliged energy suppliers to promote and install energy saving measures in homes across the UK, delivered 60,000 and 75,000 EWI installations during their respective periods of operation [27,28].…”
Section: External Wall Insulation (Ewi)mentioning
confidence: 99%