2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40962-016-0032-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Optimum Sr Level for Eutectic Si Modification in Al–Si Cast Alloys Using Thermal analysis and Tensile Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Sr amount increased to 0.03%, the fibrous eutectic Si phase became more refined, and the eutectic field became more compact (see Figure 2c). However, as shown in Figure 2d–f, increasing the amount of Sr (0.04–0.06%) in the aluminum alloys cast from the metal mold did not produce any further improvements, which agrees with the results observed by Zamani et al [13]. The results of the direct-reading spectrometer indicated that, in constitutional samples cast with an aluminum melt with initial Sr quantities of 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, and 0.06%, the residual amounts of Sr were 0.011%, 0.019%, 0.029%, 0.039%, and 0.044%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the Sr amount increased to 0.03%, the fibrous eutectic Si phase became more refined, and the eutectic field became more compact (see Figure 2c). However, as shown in Figure 2d–f, increasing the amount of Sr (0.04–0.06%) in the aluminum alloys cast from the metal mold did not produce any further improvements, which agrees with the results observed by Zamani et al [13]. The results of the direct-reading spectrometer indicated that, in constitutional samples cast with an aluminum melt with initial Sr quantities of 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, and 0.06%, the residual amounts of Sr were 0.011%, 0.019%, 0.029%, 0.039%, and 0.044%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Five general features can be extracted from the cooling curves assistant by their first derivative curves, namely: The T G(α-Al) -Growth temperature of the primary α-phases, T NUC(Al-Si) -Nucleation temperature of the eutectic structure, T E,G -Eutectic growth temperature, T End(Al-Si) -Eutectic end temperature, and ΔT E,G = T E,G(unmodified) − T E,G(modified) . Among these parameters, T NUC(Al-Si) and T E,G are greatly affected by the cooling rate, while ΔT E,G , the most reliable indicator of the modification level, has been the object of more and more attention [13,19]. The addition of Sr leads to a depression the eutectic growth temperature which is reflected in the increased value of ΔT E,G .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Al-Si-Mg alloys, which owe excellent casting characteristics including good fluidity and less solidification shrinkage [1,2], are broadly applied in casting industry [3][4][5]. However, in a normal casting process, the α-Al grains have coarse dendritic morphology, and the Si particles generally have acicular morphology and discontinuous distribution, which have detrimental influence on the strength and especially elongation of the aluminum alloys [6,7]. The chemical refinement and modification, which is achieved by adding small amount modifying elements (Ti, Sr, rare earth), is a useful method to refine the α-Al grains and improve the Si morphology, and therefore enhance the mechanical properties of alloys [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%