“…E&G have advanced previous efforts by quantifying the generation of 2,3-dimethyltartaric acid, acetic acid, and the oxo-C 7 and oxo-C 8 products by combining the use of separations by UHPLC and IC coupled to MS, HRMS, the assignment of one-dimensional (1D) 1 H and 13 C NMR and two-dimensional (2D) 13 C gCOSY spectroscopic features, as well as by employing quantitative 1 H NMR (qNMR) . The chromatographic separations were performed both with reversed-phase C18 and alkanol quaternary ammonium columns with high specificity to separate monocarboxylic, dicarboxylic, and oxocarboxylic acids prior to UV–visible, conductivity, and MS detection. , In addition, these analyses included the separation, identification, and quantification of carbonyls (CO) in the mixture of photoproducts treated with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH). ,, The undeniable power of these techniques for the analysis of this class of products, , with low limits of detection (LOD) also makes them excellent for the determination of lactic acid (LOD = 86 nM) and acetoin (LOD = 330 nM) after chromatographic separation, as exemplified by applications for food industry and clinical settings. − The work of E&G used standard addition of lactic acid and acetoin directly into the samples, providing an unambiguous comparison of the spectroscopic features and facilitating the quantification process . Furthermore, the multiple analytical techniques employed and listed above, not only HRMS as stated by V&C, provided confirmation that a major oxo-C 7 product is observed both in experiments under 1 atm air or in controls under 1 atm N 2 (g) …”