2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.10.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of phosphorus contamination during antimony implantation by measurement and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the so-called "carrier spilling effect" which is a shift of the p-n junction at the surface of the semiconductor due to sample bevelling for SRP analysis. 41) Therefore, the true carrier concentration profile for 90-120 nm depth range should be derived from the SIMS As profile.…”
Section: Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the so-called "carrier spilling effect" which is a shift of the p-n junction at the surface of the semiconductor due to sample bevelling for SRP analysis. 41) Therefore, the true carrier concentration profile for 90-120 nm depth range should be derived from the SIMS As profile.…”
Section: Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our one year monitoring of the implanter has shown a wide range of cross-contamination and its effect on N c-SRP (x) profiles (Figs. [6][7][8][9]. We have shown that cross-contamination can result into a p-n junction shift up to 4 mm that presents an 80% deeper junction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Improvement of the method proposed in [7] is incorporation of the carrier spilling correction by comparing the N c-SRP (x) profiles with calculated N c-bevel (x) profiles. This is much more precise than the previous direct comparison with N dt (x) profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation