2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01138-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of plutonium mass using gamma-ray spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although for the sample with a lesser Pu mass (PuO 2 standard), a linear dependence between the apparent mass and inverse of energy can be seen, it significantly deviates from the linearity for bulkier samples (Mock-up_1 and Mock-up_2). The deviation from linearity can be attributed to the effect of the infinite attenuation conditions at the lower energy γ-rays, making it difficult/impossible to use the conventional methodology based on infinite energy extrapolation of apparent mass (see Section S13, Supporting Information) for such samples. On the contrary, the present methodology can provide a complete isotopic inventory of such highly attenuating samples with reasonable accuracy based on the absolute efficiency calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although for the sample with a lesser Pu mass (PuO 2 standard), a linear dependence between the apparent mass and inverse of energy can be seen, it significantly deviates from the linearity for bulkier samples (Mock-up_1 and Mock-up_2). The deviation from linearity can be attributed to the effect of the infinite attenuation conditions at the lower energy γ-rays, making it difficult/impossible to use the conventional methodology based on infinite energy extrapolation of apparent mass (see Section S13, Supporting Information) for such samples. On the contrary, the present methodology can provide a complete isotopic inventory of such highly attenuating samples with reasonable accuracy based on the absolute efficiency calibration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be true for mostly all the samples encountered in nuclear forensics and even sometimes for nuclear waste samples due to the mixing of radioactivity from different sources, widely varying geometries, matrix densities, and inhomogeneous radioactivity distributions within the sample. Venkataraman and Croft, in 2003, have proposed a γray spectrometry-based methodology for the assay of plutonium in a "soup can" without requiring a plutonium standard. 37 The methodology of Venkataraman and Croft was based on an infinite energy extrapolation of apparent mass, which relies on the determination of "apparent mass" of a given radionuclide present in the sample using peak areas for multiple γ-rays without correcting for γ-ray self-attenuation within the sample matrix or the container material and plotting them as a function of the inverse of the γ-ray energy (1/E).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure of Venkataraman and Croft [4,5] was used to obtain the apparent mass of the Pu samples (m(E)) at the given energy E using the Eq. :…”
Section: Estimation Of Pu In Solid Samples By Gamma Ray Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach would fail for very heterogeneous sample distribution with the presence of radioisotopes at a few fixed locations, which are also referred to as “hot spots”. This problem can be addressed by the second approach, namely, the “apparent mass method”. However, this method also cannot be applied for highly attenuating samples and also for radioisotopes that do not have a sufficient number of γ-rays spanning over a wide energy range. We have recently proposed an iterative methodology for absolute efficiency calibration of a coaxial HPGe detector for the assay of plutonium and other γ-emitting radioisotopes in nonstandard geometry voluminous packages with unknown matrix density, where starting with the point source detector efficiency, the extended source absolute efficiency curve for a given sample has been iteratively constructed by varying the sample attenuation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%