1976
DOI: 10.1021/ja00418a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of positional weighting factors for the Swain and Lupton substituent constants f and r

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An empirical equation with the two substituent parameters, F and R [Eqn (1)] was obtained for each of the ureido hydrogens, NH 1 and NH 3 , optimizing the f and r weighting factors by a bilinear regression analysis (all multiple linear regressions were performed with the SPSS 10.0.6 para Windows software package). 20 The Swain-Lupton F and R values used were scaled for the fluorinated aromatic positions (ortho, meta and para) according to the Williams-Norrington model, 21 and were calculated for each urea using additivity principles ( F and R).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empirical equation with the two substituent parameters, F and R [Eqn (1)] was obtained for each of the ureido hydrogens, NH 1 and NH 3 , optimizing the f and r weighting factors by a bilinear regression analysis (all multiple linear regressions were performed with the SPSS 10.0.6 para Windows software package). 20 The Swain-Lupton F and R values used were scaled for the fluorinated aromatic positions (ortho, meta and para) according to the Williams-Norrington model, 21 and were calculated for each urea using additivity principles ( F and R).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The f and r constants according to Swain and Lupton [24], [25], representing ®eld and resonance effects of the substituents were taken from [26]. To avoid the necessity of introducing parameters for each substituent position the f and r constants were multiplied with the corresponding weighting factors for the substituent position according to Williams and Norrington [27] (f: ortho 1.248, meta 0.980, para 1.000; r: ortho 0.863, meta 0.347, para 1.000).…”
Section: Qsar Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the substituents X (see Figure Table 1) were described by the two indicator variables I(OEt) and I(NH 2 ), i.e., for esters 1 -5 I(OEt) ¼ 1, I(NH 2 ) ¼ 0; for amides 5 -10 I(OEt) ¼ 0, I(NH 2 ) ¼ 1; and for acids 11 -15 I(OEt) ¼ 0, I(NH 2 ) ¼ 0, thus allowing a discrimination between the three subgroups of derivatives. The values p, f, and r (see Table 2) were taken from the literature [5,6]. To more adequately describe the electronic effect of substituents R' -R''' positional weighting factors f and r (see Table 3) for Sf and Sr, respectively, were applied [6,7].…”
Section: Compdmentioning
confidence: 99%