2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2008.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of proximity effect parameters by means of CD-linearity in sub 100 nm electron beam lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity effect can be expressed by the point spread function (PSF) which represents the absorbed energy distribution in radial distance from the point of incidence after point exposure [5]. The PSF are usually obtained by Monte Carlo simulation using various algorithms containing physical model of electron interactions in defined materials (mostly two layer sandwichsubstrate and resist) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity effect can be expressed by the point spread function (PSF) which represents the absorbed energy distribution in radial distance from the point of incidence after point exposure [5]. The PSF are usually obtained by Monte Carlo simulation using various algorithms containing physical model of electron interactions in defined materials (mostly two layer sandwichsubstrate and resist) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, fabrication of such small structures is at the limit of what is possible today. One of the major challenges is that during the electron beam fabrication procedure, the proximity effect makes it very difficult to produce sharp edges [14,15]. Hence, the real fabricated structures differ considerably from ideal structures, intended to be fabricated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gate, V01, and M1-level designs can be easily and independently modified in layout. Using appropriate proximity effect correction, 22 new designs are fractured and patterned in e-beam lithography without needing substantial development, if any, to optimize exposure or develop conditions. As an example, we show in Figure 2B SEM images of three different devices patterned in one reticle with varying P/X dimensions but fixed pitch and fixed V01/ M1-level design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%