2013
DOI: 10.1177/0954411913487841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of remodeling parameters for a strain-adaptive finite element model of the distal ulna

Abstract: Strain energy-based adaptive material models are used to predict bone resorption resulting from stress shielding induced by prosthetic joint implants. Generally, such models are governed by two key parameters: a homeostatic strain-energy state (K) and a threshold deviation from this state required to initiate bone reformation (s). A refinement procedure has been performed to estimate these parameters in the femur and glenoid; this study investigates the specific influences of these parameters on resulting dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in strain energy density (ΔSED) for every element from the intact state to the reconstructed state was also calculated. The expected time‐zero bone response (resorb, no change, or remodel) for each element of bone in each slice and quadrant was then estimated using the methodology presented by Neuert et al 22 using a threshold value of 55% change in strain energy density (ΔSED), where a decrease in SED of more than 55% would result in an element being classified as having bone resorption potential, and an increase of more than 55% would result in bone remodeling potential. The resulting elemental response was volume‐weighted based on the volume of each individual element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in strain energy density (ΔSED) for every element from the intact state to the reconstructed state was also calculated. The expected time‐zero bone response (resorb, no change, or remodel) for each element of bone in each slice and quadrant was then estimated using the methodology presented by Neuert et al 22 using a threshold value of 55% change in strain energy density (ΔSED), where a decrease in SED of more than 55% would result in an element being classified as having bone resorption potential, and an increase of more than 55% would result in bone remodeling potential. The resulting elemental response was volume‐weighted based on the volume of each individual element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the intact and reconstructed states resulted in identical humeral geometries allowing for direct element-to-element comparison of changes in bone stress. 20 The bone and implant were then meshed with quadratic tetrahedral elements with a maximum edge length of 2 mm and maximum deviation factor of 0.06 mm. 22
Figure 2 For each humeral implant stem investigated, partitions were created by cutting and reaming the trabecular bone with the desired implant size.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity of bone resorption was determined using a threshold value of change in SED of 55%, where bone would be expected to remodel and become stronger, remain the same, or resorb if the change in SED was greater than, equal to, or less than this threshold value, respectively. 20 Each element in the slice of interest was placed into one of these three categories depending on its change in SED. To determine the overall percent volume of bone with resorbing potential, the volume of the elements that exhibited change in SED less than the 55% threshold were divided by the sum of the total volume of the elements in all categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these data, we calculated: (1) the volume-weighted average change in the magnitude of von Mises stress of the bone following reconstruction, calculated with respect to the intact state ( σ Δ VWA ), 7 (2) the volume-weighted average deviatoric component of the change in stress tensor with respect to the intact state (ΔS), to account for any changes in the direction of stress, 16 below the intact state occurred, based on strain-adaptive bone remodeling theory. 28,29 Corresponding equations for each cal-…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%