2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sex from the proximal hand phalanges in a Thai population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…individuals of known identity who had died in the Chiang Mai region in northern Thailand since 1990 (Mahakkanukrauh et al, 2013). Additional trapezoids were examined from the Early-Mid Holocene archeological site of Gobero, located in the Republic of Niger (Sereno et al, 2008;Stojanowski, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…individuals of known identity who had died in the Chiang Mai region in northern Thailand since 1990 (Mahakkanukrauh et al, 2013). Additional trapezoids were examined from the Early-Mid Holocene archeological site of Gobero, located in the Republic of Niger (Sereno et al, 2008;Stojanowski, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to derive the population-specific reference data in each population to increase the accuracy of sex estimation. In Thailand, although several studies have been reported in sex estimation using Thai skeletal remains, such as humerus [4], cranial and appendicular bones [13], sternum [14], vertebral column [15], radius [16], calcaneus [17,18], mastoid process [19], metacarpal bone [20], iliac bone [21], proximal hand phalange [22], talus [23], navicular bone [24], skull [25], sternum [26], maxillary suture [27], scapula [28], and os coxa [29]. However, studies of sex estimation from fragmented upper limb bones have rarely been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a recent study on a Thai population of 249 individuals provided discriminant function equations for sex assessment. Correct classification rates ranged from 87.6% to 92.3%, with left 1st proximal phalanges presenting the highest accuracy (92.3%), followed by the left 2nd proximal phalanges (91.9%) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning proximal hand phalanges, however, there are few researches investigating sex determination. Among them, some utilize multiple functions from all ten proximal hand phalanges [4,6] while others focus on specific phalanges or phalangeal dimensions [3,5,21]. Due to the fact that most functions selected vary among studies, a direct comparison was rarely possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%