1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36396182146.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sibship in any two persons

Abstract: The sharing of one allele and the sharing of no alleles at a polymorphic locus of high heterozygosity provide limited information for and against sibship, respectively. The sharing of two alleles produces strong evidence favoring sibship. In a given case, the study of more than three polymorphic loci of high heterozygosity may be needed to develop the evidence that two people are siblings. The general logic and methods used for siblings apply to kinship analyses of other two-person pedigrees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis was performed using Instat (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA), Prism (Graph Pad Software), PHASE version 2.1 [26,55], DnaSP 3.5 (http://www.bio.ub.es/julio/DnaSP.html), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and Haploview 3.32 (wwwbroad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview) [21] First degree relatives were identified by calculating cumulative sibship indices (CSIs) using a preliminary C11 analysis software (under development by Cobb and Taylor) and the STR allele data for the entire study population with frequencies provided with Identifiler [18,19]. Only the first enrolled subject from a pair of first degree relatives was included in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Statistical Analsysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis was performed using Instat (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA), Prism (Graph Pad Software), PHASE version 2.1 [26,55], DnaSP 3.5 (http://www.bio.ub.es/julio/DnaSP.html), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and Haploview 3.32 (wwwbroad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview) [21] First degree relatives were identified by calculating cumulative sibship indices (CSIs) using a preliminary C11 analysis software (under development by Cobb and Taylor) and the STR allele data for the entire study population with frequencies provided with Identifiler [18,19]. Only the first enrolled subject from a pair of first degree relatives was included in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Statistical Analsysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Genotypes of contaminated samples are assigned by the following process: if the genotypes of two samples at an SNP are the same, the genotypes of the two samples are not changed. If the genotypes are different, the genotypes of the two samples are assigned stochastically either as heterozygous or unchanged (the probability of the heterozygous and unchanged status is the same, 0.5 for each) for both samples.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 For general detection of related samples, a likelihood ratio test based on posterior probability of genotype under certain relationships was proposed. 4 In the case of a family-based study, an identity-by-state (IBS)-based method 5,6 for a detection of errors in a sib-pair relationship was proposed, with the method using the summation of the IBS for a pair of sibs. Conversely, an identity-by-descent (IBD)-based method (PLINK 7 ) was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the STR data were not considered in further kinship analysis due to the fact that Wenk and colleagues' (1996) KI calculations using the HUMTH01 data yielded inconclusive results for the cluster burials with KI ranging between 1.0 to 4.2. Single polymorphic loci have been shown to provide little power to resolve biological relationships (Lins et al, 1996, Tzeng et al, 2000, Wenk et al, 1996.…”
Section: Adna Str Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is a preliminary investigation of the efficacy of aDNA analyses to determine a kinship system from the archaeological record. Statistical approaches were borrowed from conventional kinship theory (as summarized in Wenk et al, 1996), and from forensic science (Allen et al, 1998) and used in the context of an archaeological burial site. Recovered aDNA from bone and tooth samples was submitted to mtDNA and STR amplification analyses to produce genotypes used in the calculation of the Probability of Matrilineal Kinship By Chance (PrMKBC), and a Kinship Index (KI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%