2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Size and Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Real-time Myocardial Perfusion Echocardiography: A Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A normal stress MCE conferred a low cardiac event rate. On the other hand, patients with an abnormal MCE have higher cardiac event rate . Previous studies showed that no‐reflow extent was greater in patients with impaired CFR (<2.5) than in those with preserved CFR (≥ 2.5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A normal stress MCE conferred a low cardiac event rate. On the other hand, patients with an abnormal MCE have higher cardiac event rate . Previous studies showed that no‐reflow extent was greater in patients with impaired CFR (<2.5) than in those with preserved CFR (≥ 2.5) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been previously demonstrated that qualitative perfusion score indices of RT-MPE and CMR correlate well. 9,12 Previous studies evaluating the prediction of MACE by CMR and RT-MPE have been performed independently, without comparing the two modalities to each other. 17,18 It has been shown that poor perfusion score index after myocardial infarction predicts increased LV remodeling.…”
Section: Rt-mpe Both Infarct Mass By Cmr and Mean Blood Flow By Rt-mpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have recently shown that quantitative measures from RT‐MPE can effectively predict major adverse cardiac events following a STEMI . Qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by both CMR and RT‐MPE has been previously shown to predict functional outcomes following a myocardial infarction . However, there have been no trials to date comparing the ability of these modalities to predict adverse events following myocardial infarction using either quantitative or qualitative measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigating coronary microvascular function Lanza et al 7 49 59 MI Perfusion defect Standard echo Ballcells et al 50 30 MI Risk area/no-reflow Dobutamine stress echo Galiuto et al 51 24 MI No-reflow Standard echo Bolognese et al 52 124 MI No-reflow Standard echo Agati et al 53 12 MI No-reflow SPECT Janardhanan et al 54 42 MI No-reflow CMR Moir et al 55 90 CAD Stress perfusion defect Coronary angiography Galiuto et al 56 50 MI No-reflow Standard echo Trindade et al 57 20 MI No-reflow CMR Galiuto et al 58 110 MI No-reflow Coronary angiography Abdelmoneim et al 59 2 HM Vascularity Standard echo Hayat et al 60 83 CAD Stress perfusion defect SPECT Senior et al 61 662 CAD Stress perfusion defect SPECT Mansencal et al 62 31 HM Vascularity Histopathology Galiuto et al 63 20 Takotsubo Perfusion defects Standard echo CAD, stable coronary artery disease; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; HM, heart masses; MI, myocardial infarction; SPECT, single-photon emission tomography. tomography (MIBI-SPECT), 69 in detecting and quantifying the extent of no-reflow.…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%