2003
DOI: 10.3313/jls.40.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of strength parameters for landslide slope stability analysis by laboratory test and inverse calculation engagement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skempton (1985) concluded that the variation in strength within a usual range of slow laboratory test (0.002-0.01 mm/min) was negligible. Yatabe et al (1991) and Mitachi (2003) also reported that the residual strength hardly changed with changing the shear displacement rate. Contrary to these studies, Lemos et al (1985) pointed out that the residual strength of soils showing the sliding shear with a high clay content increased with increasing the shear displacement rate, whereas the residual strength of soils showing the turbulent shear with a low clay content exhibited a reversed rate eŠect.…”
Section: In‰uence Of Shear Displacement Rate On Residual Strength Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Skempton (1985) concluded that the variation in strength within a usual range of slow laboratory test (0.002-0.01 mm/min) was negligible. Yatabe et al (1991) and Mitachi (2003) also reported that the residual strength hardly changed with changing the shear displacement rate. Contrary to these studies, Lemos et al (1985) pointed out that the residual strength of soils showing the sliding shear with a high clay content increased with increasing the shear displacement rate, whereas the residual strength of soils showing the turbulent shear with a low clay content exhibited a reversed rate eŠect.…”
Section: In‰uence Of Shear Displacement Rate On Residual Strength Of mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Suzuki et al (2000) and Mitachi et al (2003) have reconˆrmed the suggestion of Skempton (1964) that the residual strength of reconstituted sample was not aŠected by the eŠective stress history in the consolidation process represented by a change of overconsolidation ratio, OCR. The in‰uence of OCR, however, has never been examined from the viewpoint of the consolidation yield stress for undisturbed samples.…”
Section: In‰uence Of Stress History In Consolidation and Shear Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations