2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934809090111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sulfonylurea herbicides in water using solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography with electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure allowed the screening of an enhanced panel of analytes with comparable recovery rates and quantification limits to previously published procedures [8,11]. Taken together the proposed method can be used for routine monitoring of polar herbicide residues in real world drinking water samples in accordance with legal requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure allowed the screening of an enhanced panel of analytes with comparable recovery rates and quantification limits to previously published procedures [8,11]. Taken together the proposed method can be used for routine monitoring of polar herbicide residues in real world drinking water samples in accordance with legal requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, determination of these compounds was achieved by capillary electrophoresis with ultraviolet detection (CE-UV) [5] and immunoassay methods [6]. At present, however, the most common approaches to sulfonylurea determination involve liquid chromatography (LC) with either diode array (DAD) or mass spectrometric (MS) detection [1,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further demonstrate the purification effect of the MIL@MIP pretreatment method, 15 anonymous samples, including 5 water samples, 5 soil samples, and 5 soybean samples, were subjected to extract using MIL@MIP sorbents and assayed via the established procedure. Although no positive result was found among the collected samples, the efficiency of the presented MISPE coupled with HPLC method for spiked samples was compared with other reported methods such as HPLC/MS/MS coupled with traditional C 18 SPE [37] and HPLC method coupled with MIP-SPE [21]. In terms of LOD values and recoveries, the efficiency of this method was better than that of the two other methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Analytes determination and quantitation was carried out with liquid chromatography with electrospray mass spectrometry equipped with ion trap analyzer. The recovery rates range from 76.6 to 109.1% with RSD between 0.3 to 13.8% with the HLB cartridges which was the best one of the three cartridges evaluated (Ouyang et al, 2009). Also gas chromatography, mainly with MS detection, has been extensively employed for the measurement of herbicide residues in water; different methods had been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Herbicide Residue Analysis In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%