2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.125307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the band gap and the split-off band in wurtzite GaAs using Raman and photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy

Abstract: GaAs nanowires with a 100% wurtzite structure are synthesized by the vapor-liquid-solid method in a molecular beam epitaxy system, using gold as a catalyst. We use resonant Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence to determine the position of the crystal-field split-off band of hexagonal wurtzite GaAs. The temperature dependence of this transition enables us to extract the value at 0 K, which is 1.982 eV. Our photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy measurements are consistent with a band gap of GaAs wurtzite… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystal field splitting and spin-orbit splitting of the unstrained nanowires are found to be D CR ¼ 197 meV±50 meV and D SO ¼ 293 meV ± 129 meV, respectively. Both of these values agree well with other experimental results 41,42 (D SO ¼ 379 meV) and theoretical predictions (the crystal field splitting ranges from 180 meV to 212 meV between different ab-initio methods). The WZ GaAs k Á p model can therefore explain all optical transitions observed in our experiment, with the exception of the photons identified by the yellow peak in Fig 5. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the nature of these peaks and are currently ongoing.…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The crystal field splitting and spin-orbit splitting of the unstrained nanowires are found to be D CR ¼ 197 meV±50 meV and D SO ¼ 293 meV ± 129 meV, respectively. Both of these values agree well with other experimental results 41,42 (D SO ¼ 379 meV) and theoretical predictions (the crystal field splitting ranges from 180 meV to 212 meV between different ab-initio methods). The WZ GaAs k Á p model can therefore explain all optical transitions observed in our experiment, with the exception of the photons identified by the yellow peak in Fig 5. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the nature of these peaks and are currently ongoing.…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Experimental results showed the bandgap of WZ phase is larger than that of ZB for GaAs [111][112][113], as well as for other material systems [114,115]. However for GaAs, contrary reports showing a smaller bandgap of the WZ phase than the ZB phase are also available [112,116,117]. In addition to the differences in the bandgap, the linear polarization of the PL emission was found to be strongly dependent on the crystal phase of the NWs.…”
Section: Extended Defectsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For transition C, full circles refer to data extracted using a best fit to PLE spectra, and open squares refer to data extracted by employing F abs in panel (a) and the graphical method outlined in Figure 6 (b 20 Moreover, our results differ from resonant Raman scattering measurements performed on WZ GaAs NWs indicating that the T-induced redshift of transition C is greater than that of the band gap in ZB GaAs. 39 Our findings clearly show that the main mechanisms ruling the extent of the band gap variation with temperature, namely, the lattice expansion and the electronÀphonon interaction, do not depend on the NW crystal phase. Indeed, in both ZB and WZ phases of a binary compound, which we can indicate as AB, four A atoms nearest neighbors of a B atom are placed at the vertices of a regular tetrahedron around the B atom and nine out of the 12 second nearest neighbors are at identical crystallographic locations while the other second nearest neighbors are equidistant.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 89%