1989
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(89)80051-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the critical thickness and the sensitivity for thin-film analysis by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of the non-ionic surfactant allowed for the preparation of a smear that would most likely fall within the critical thickness for the given matrix. [31] Measurements were thus made of thin smears of lipstick that were modified so as to contain a homogeneously dispersed internal standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of the non-ionic surfactant allowed for the preparation of a smear that would most likely fall within the critical thickness for the given matrix. [31] Measurements were thus made of thin smears of lipstick that were modified so as to contain a homogeneously dispersed internal standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of the concentration of a given analyte, C i , was accomplished through Eqn (1), [30,31] …”
Section: Spectral Processing and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important factor for both TXRF and GEXRF is the critical thickness above which the advantages of total reÑection are lost because of increased matrix e †ects ; values for di †erent sample types were described by Klockenka mper and von Bohlen. 8 The accuracy of an XRF analysis is mainly determined by the matrix e †ects. Since none of the techniques have negligible matrix e †ects, control of extraneous additions and of losses before or during the measurement step also determine the accuracy of trace element analysis at the lg g~1 level.…”
Section: Comparison Of Xrf Techniques For Trace Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precondition is that the sample must be present as a very thin layer, otherwise the principle of total reÑection will be lost. 8 Owing to these operational conditions, the matrix e †ects of conventional XRF cannot occur and a simple calibration by internal standardization can be performed.9 Normally, measurements in TXRF are performed in ambient air. For the detection of low-Z elements, however, a vacuum chamber is necessary (to reduce absorption) and a special energy-dispersive Ge(HP) detector is used that meets all requirements for low-energy detection, such as a 0.4 lm thick diamondlike carbon window, an ion-implanted contact layer, a thin dead layer and reduced electronic noise contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extinction depth corresponds to the depth from which the emitted fluorescence intensity is attenuated by a factor of e −1 on the way from the fluorescence atom to the surface, whereas the critical thickness corresponds to the depth region for which absorption effects for the incident and emitted radiation can be safely neglected [81]. This restriction for the linear regime of calibration curves was first discussed for TXRF [82].…”
Section: Gixrf and Gexrfmentioning
confidence: 99%