2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-019-00411-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Hydrodynamic Load on an Inundated Bridge Deck by Measurements Performed on a Physical Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering the structural analysis of a bridge, flood action can be split in static and dynamic components (Hamill, 1998). Flume experiments are often employed to determine the magnitude of dynamic thrusts on bridge decks by averaging the results of sensor readings on a predefined timeframe (e.g., 50s) (Dráb et al, 2019). Interestingly, lower discharges can lead to higher forces on structural components in specific cases, where dynamic components such as drag do not increase monotonically together with the water height (Oudenbroek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Forces Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the structural analysis of a bridge, flood action can be split in static and dynamic components (Hamill, 1998). Flume experiments are often employed to determine the magnitude of dynamic thrusts on bridge decks by averaging the results of sensor readings on a predefined timeframe (e.g., 50s) (Dráb et al, 2019). Interestingly, lower discharges can lead to higher forces on structural components in specific cases, where dynamic components such as drag do not increase monotonically together with the water height (Oudenbroek et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Forces Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%