Determination of the Optimum Removal Efficiency of Fine Particulate Matter Using Activated Carbon Fiber (ACF)

Abstract

In Korea, concentrations of particulate matter (PM10) are significantly higher in urban railway tunnels (178.1 μg/m3) than in metropolitan areas (49 μg/m3). In railway tunnels in Korea, it was maintained at 3–4 times higher concentration than general atmosphere and platform. Dust generated by trains is scattered at high speed in these tunnels, making filtration difficult; therefore, the development of filters that can be maintained in tunnels is required. In the present study, we examined PM adsorption in the laboratory scale using activated carbon fiber (ACF), which has high adsorption and capacity. The ACF depth, velocity of flow, and fine PM concentration in the tunnel were the experimental variables. We compared PM concentrations before and after the filter experiments, and calculated removal efficiency to determine the optimal conditions. Comprehensive examination of the experimental variables and differential pressure showed that the optimal conditions for an ACF specimen were a wind speed of 3.0 m/s and the ACF depth of 400 mm. The average removal efficiency of PM10 was 55.5%, and that of PM2.5 was 36.6%. The reproducibility tests showed that the ACF filter could be washed and reused and is suitable for various places because it is easily maintained.

Direct Measuring Particulate Matters in Smoke Plumes from Chimneys in a Textile Dyeing Industrial Park by a Self-Developed PM Detector on an UAV in Yangtze River Delta of China

“…It may be due to the high temperature, causing oil and wax compounds in the fabric to be volatile in thermo-fixing machine, which is beneficial to the generation of PM 2.5 [34]. For the dying process (a panel), the sum of proportion of particle size range between 1-2.5 µm and 2.5-10 µm from Chimney D1 is the highest (7.84%), indicating that the end treatment of activated carbon adsorption is harder to capture the large PM than electrostatic precipitation [35], which might cause PM emission higher up (Figure 10a). For the printing process (b panel, A2 pigment printing, B3 and B4 digital printing), the proportion of PM size distribution below 2.5 µm was also the highest.…”