2018
DOI: 10.24106/kefdergi.413317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of The Variables That Predict The Metacognitive Learning Strategies of The Students of the Preschool, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, and Art Programs

Abstract: Çalışmada okulöncesi eğitimi, psikolojik danışmanlık ve rehberlik, resim-iş eğitimi anabilim dallarında öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel öğrenme stratejilerinin kontrol odağı, okuma motivasyonu ve sınav kaygı düzeyleri ile ilişkisinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi ve üstbilişsel öğrenme stratejilerini yordayan değişkenlerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak üstbilişsel öğrenme stratejilerinin sınıf, okunan bölüm, yaş, mezuniyet notu, üniversite giriş puanı, mezun olunan lise tü… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Yildiz et al (2013) adapted the Adult Reading Motivation Inventory into Turkish; Kurnaz (2019) also developed the Reading Intrinsic Motivation Scale. There are studies examining preservice teachers' critical reading perceptions and levels (Aybek & Aslan, 2015;Bagci, 2019;Cam Aktas, 2016;Kaplan, 2021;Karasakaloglu et al, 2012b;Maltepe, 2016;Ulu et al, 2017); reading motivation (Baba Basara Baydilek et al, 2018;Gecgel et al, 2020;Savaskan & Ozdemir, 2017;Soyucok & Balantekin, 2021), and metacognitive reading strategies (Babacan, 2012;Demir, 2022;Emre, 2019;Kana, 2015;Ozdemir, 2018;Ozden, 2018;Uyar et al, 2012). However, no study was found in which all three variables were used together.…”
Section: Significance and Purpose Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Yildiz et al (2013) adapted the Adult Reading Motivation Inventory into Turkish; Kurnaz (2019) also developed the Reading Intrinsic Motivation Scale. There are studies examining preservice teachers' critical reading perceptions and levels (Aybek & Aslan, 2015;Bagci, 2019;Cam Aktas, 2016;Kaplan, 2021;Karasakaloglu et al, 2012b;Maltepe, 2016;Ulu et al, 2017); reading motivation (Baba Basara Baydilek et al, 2018;Gecgel et al, 2020;Savaskan & Ozdemir, 2017;Soyucok & Balantekin, 2021), and metacognitive reading strategies (Babacan, 2012;Demir, 2022;Emre, 2019;Kana, 2015;Ozdemir, 2018;Ozden, 2018;Uyar et al, 2012). However, no study was found in which all three variables were used together.…”
Section: Significance and Purpose Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the locus of control of teacher candidates has been studied in relation to various variables. These variables include the following: language performance [45]; academic self-concept and academic performance [46]; optimistic tendency [47]; learning approaches [48]; decision-making styles [49]; self-efficacy beliefs [50]; aggression and multidimensional perfectionism [51]; critical thinking attitudes [52]; human values [53]; attitudes towards teaching profession [54]; metacognitive learning strategies [55]; learned powerfulness as predictor of self-leadership [56]; problem-solving skill [57]; education philosophy [58]; interpersonal problem-solving approaches [59]; academic self-efficacy [60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%