2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of trace metals by anodic stripping voltammetry using a bismuth-modified carbon nanotube electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
138
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
138
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit was given by the equation C L ¼ 3s bl =S, where s bl is the standard deviation of the blank measurements and S is the sensitivity of the calibration graph. The detection limit of Zn 2+ for 60 s accumulation was calculated to be 0.05 μM, which is lower than that at Bi-modified carbon nanotube electrode [34], Hg-coated glassy carbon electrode [35], the polymer-coated Bi film electrode [36], while higher than that at the tin-film electrode (with 120 s of accumulation) [25] and the BiBE (with 180 s of accumulation) [20]. Although a lower detection limit can be obtained at the SnBiE with a prolonged accumulation time, a short analysis time is sufficient for determination of Zn 2+ in real samples.…”
Section: Calibration Curvementioning
confidence: 75%
“…The detection limit was given by the equation C L ¼ 3s bl =S, where s bl is the standard deviation of the blank measurements and S is the sensitivity of the calibration graph. The detection limit of Zn 2+ for 60 s accumulation was calculated to be 0.05 μM, which is lower than that at Bi-modified carbon nanotube electrode [34], Hg-coated glassy carbon electrode [35], the polymer-coated Bi film electrode [36], while higher than that at the tin-film electrode (with 120 s of accumulation) [25] and the BiBE (with 180 s of accumulation) [20]. Although a lower detection limit can be obtained at the SnBiE with a prolonged accumulation time, a short analysis time is sufficient for determination of Zn 2+ in real samples.…”
Section: Calibration Curvementioning
confidence: 75%
“…For 5 min accumulation, a proportional relationship between the stripping peak current (i p ) and the concentration of Pb 2+ was obtained in the range of 1.0 to 90 nM (i p ¼ 20.11 + 0.12C, r ¼ 0.995, i p in mA, C in nM) with a sensitivity of 0.12 mA/nM. The detection limit given by the equation C L ¼ 3s bl /S was calculated to be 0.3 nM, which is lower than that of the carbon paste electrode [25], the Hg-coated GCE [26], the polymer-coated Bi film electrode [27] and the Bi-modified carbon nanotube electrode [28] and so on. It can be proved that the resulting BiNPs/NA/GCE have a wider linear dynamic range, lower detection limit and larger sensitivity than most of the other methods for voltammetric stripping determination of Pb 2+ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The bismuth alone (bismuth bulk electrode [26], or a bismuth film [27]) or modified by carbon nanotubes [28], was used for titration (by anodic stripping voltammetries) of mixtures of lead, cadmium, zinc, or indium; low detection limits (~1 µg/L) seems to be achieved. Since its introduction by Ralph Norman Adams [31] as an alternative to the mercury electrode, the carbon paste electrode has been largely used for its ad- …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%