2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0029665119001277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of variability in serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol response to the replacement of dietary saturated fat with unsaturated fat, in the Reading, Imperial, Surrey Saturated fat Cholesterol Intervention (‘RISSCI’) project

Abstract: Reducing serum low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by lowering the intake of saturated fatty acids (SFA) to no more than 10% of total energy, remains the mainstay of dietary guidelines to prevent cardiovascular diseases (1). However, there is marked interindividual variation in the serum LDL-C response to the lowering of SFA. If the variability of this response exceeds the potential reduction in LDL-C, then this may limit the usefulness of this recommendation in the UK population. The overall aim of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean difference for the change in both HDL-C and non-HDL-C increased during the high SFA diet (HDL-C +4.8%, non-HDL-C +5.2%), and decreased during the lower SFA (high UFA) diet (HDL-C -7.4%, non-HDL-C -13.7%). There was no significant difference in the change in serum remnant-cholesterol concentrations between diets.The similar effects of dietary SFA on both serum HDL-C and non-HDL-C in this study, are consistent with a meta-analysis of intervention trials (1), and a previous report of the effects of this dietary exchange on serum LDL-C from the RISSC-1 study (3) , given that LDL-C represents the main component of non-HDL-C. Since dietary-induced changes in HDL-C may not be causally related to protection against ASCVD (4) , the effects of SFA on non-HDL-C are of relatively greater clinical importance.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean difference for the change in both HDL-C and non-HDL-C increased during the high SFA diet (HDL-C +4.8%, non-HDL-C +5.2%), and decreased during the lower SFA (high UFA) diet (HDL-C -7.4%, non-HDL-C -13.7%). There was no significant difference in the change in serum remnant-cholesterol concentrations between diets.The similar effects of dietary SFA on both serum HDL-C and non-HDL-C in this study, are consistent with a meta-analysis of intervention trials (1), and a previous report of the effects of this dietary exchange on serum LDL-C from the RISSC-1 study (3) , given that LDL-C represents the main component of non-HDL-C. Since dietary-induced changes in HDL-C may not be causally related to protection against ASCVD (4) , the effects of SFA on non-HDL-C are of relatively greater clinical importance.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The similar effects of dietary SFA on both serum HDL-C and non-HDL-C in this study, are consistent with a meta-analysis of intervention trials (1), and a previous report of the effects of this dietary exchange on serum LDL-C from the RISSC-1 study (3) , given that LDL-C represents the main component of non-HDL-C. Since dietary-induced changes in HDL-C may not be causally related to protection against ASCVD (4) , the effects of SFA on non-HDL-C are of relatively greater clinical importance.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Inter and intra-individual variation in serum LDL-C has been characterised in response to various dietary exchanges and the NCEP step 2 diets (48,49) . Variation in serum LDL-C in the order of between 0•5-1•5 mmol/l to þ0•5 mmol/l, has also been reported more recently in a number of well-controlled dietary interventions in response to the removal and replacement of SFA with UFA (50,51) (Fig. 1), and addition of SFA as dairy fat (52) .…”
Section: Variation In Serum Ldl-c Response To Dietary Cholesterol And...mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This study aims to assess the reproducibility of an identical dietary intervention (Reading, Imperial, Surrey Saturated fat Cholesterol Intervention study 1 and 2, RISSCI-1 and RISSCI-2) performed on two occasions, on the outcomes of fasted lipids.In RISSCI-1, healthy male participants (48±11 y; 25±3 kg/m2), recruited at the Universities of Reading and Surrey, were asked to follow a high saturated fatty acid diet (SFA) (18% total energy) followed by a lower SFA diet (10% total energy), each for 4 weeks. The diets were isoenergetic and dietary SFA was replaced with unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) using a food exchange model (2,3) . The 8-week sequential, non-randomised study, included three visits; visit 1 as a baseline, and visits 2 and 3 after the high and the lower SFA diet, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%