1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0733-5210(88)80003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of variation in oat kernel morphology by digital image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation analysis suggested that grain size affected packing efficiency and as well as suggesting that smaller grains packed more efficiently. This is consistent with concepts forwarded by Symons and Fulcher (1988) that rounded kernels improved test weight by improving packing. The trends in packing efficiency of size fractions were largely consistent with the trends found in the unfractionated samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Correlation analysis suggested that grain size affected packing efficiency and as well as suggesting that smaller grains packed more efficiently. This is consistent with concepts forwarded by Symons and Fulcher (1988) that rounded kernels improved test weight by improving packing. The trends in packing efficiency of size fractions were largely consistent with the trends found in the unfractionated samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The β-glucan content in oats and barley varied depending on location (environmental variation) and growing seasons (Peterson et al 1995). Genetic and environmental factors can also affect other quality characteristics such as the shape and size of the groat (Symons and Fulcher 1988), which can influence the milling quality. Oat spikelets may contain one, two, three, or more kernels and the outermost of these, called the primary kernel, is the largest and mass decreases with higher orders of kernels.…”
Section: Agricultural Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With digital image analysis, it is possible rapidly to measure the dimensions of individual cereal kernels (Berman et al 1996;Symons et al 1996) and thus to investigate within-sample variation for both kernel size and shape. Image analysis has been used successfully in wheat classification (Symons and Fulcher 1988b), wheat grading and cultivar identification (Draper and Keefe 1989), and in studies of variation in oat kernel morphology (Symons and Fulcher 1988a). In barley, it has been used to study differences in kernel morphology between lateral and central kernels (Gebhardt et al 1993), and to identify cultivars (Shrestha 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%