An instrumental method for the evaluation of olive oil quality was developed. Twenty-one relevant aroma active compounds were quantified in 95 olive oil samples of different quality by headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and dynamic headspace coupled to GC-MS. On the basis of these stable isotope dilution assay results, statistical evaluation by partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed. Important variables were the odor activity values of ethyl isobutanoate, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, 3-methylbutanol, butyric acid, E,E-2,4-decadienal, hexanoic acid, guaiacol, 2-phenylethanol, and the sum of the odor activity values of Z-3-hexenal, E-2-hexenal, Z-3-hexenyl acetate, and Z-3-hexenol. Classification performed with these variables predicted 88% of the olive oils' quality correctly. Additionally, the aroma compounds, which are characteristic for some off-flavors, were dissolved in refined plant oil. Sensory evaluation of these models demonstrated that the off-flavors rancid, fusty, and vinegary could be successfully simulated by a limited number of odorants. KEYWORDS: olive oil, sensory quality, stable isotope dilution assay, headspace solid phase microextraction, partial least-squares discriminant analysisThe rising olive oil consumption outside the Mediterranean area can be explained due to the health benefits attributed to olive oil, basically by its specific odor and taste characteristics.
1It is therefore not surprising that the quality of olive oil is determined primarily by its sensory properties. Sensory evaluation is based on the so-called "Panel Test" developed by the International Olive Council.2 This procedure, if performed by well-trained panelists, gives good and reproducible results, which are comparable with those of other panels. However, there are still disadvantages in the sensory quality evaluation. These are (i) the lack of stable and standardized reference oils for the different off-flavors and (ii) the large number of panelists that is needed for statistically confirmed results.
3Several instrumental methods have been developed as alternatives to sensory methods to evaluate the quality of olive oil. Many authors identified the important aroma active compounds in olive oil even in those with different off-flavors. Two review papers summarize the scientific findings.4,5 Headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was found as the best method for the aroma analysis of olive oil. 6 However, this method only gives exact quantification results if recovery rates and response factors are determined for each compound, which was not carried out in most studies. These disadvantages of using external calibration can be circumvented by application of stable isotope dilution assay.7 Exact quantification data are needed for the calculation of odor activity values and therefore for the assessment how important an aroma active compound is for the overall flavor. Correlation of sensory data with quantification results was made by some authors, 8,9 but not on the b...