Determining High School Students’ Mathematical Thinking Styles: Latent Class Analysis

Akçakın, Veysel; Kaya, Gürcan

doi:10.15390/eb.2020.8070

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By contrast, Purnamasari et al (2021) found that the digital skills of secondary school students were at a moderate level, whereas Perdana et al (2019), Laxman (2020), and Gui and Argentin (2011) found that these students were poor in such skills. Studies measuring students' mathematical thinking skills found that secondary school students were good at mathematical thinking (Akçakın & Kaya, 2020;Arslan & Yıldız, 2010;Göl, 2017;Kocaman, 2017). Similarly, studies conducted abroad reported that secondary school students had high mathematical thinking skills (Cortez, Cuevaz, & Castillo, 2019;Gine, 2010;Lutfiyya, 1998;Mashaqbah, 2017;Mustafa, Sari, & Baharullah, 2019;van Velzen, 2016).…”

Section: Discussion Regarding the First Research Questionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Anahtar Yetkinlikler Becerilerinin İncelenmesi

Karatepe

Akay

2023

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

21st Century Skills are studied by many institutions and organizations around the world. In this context, Turkey has established the Turkish Qualifications Framework and determined 8 Key Competencies for high schools. In this study, the status of high school students having 8 Key Competencies was investigated. The research was carried out with the relational screening method. The data of the study were collected from 1089 secondary school students studying in a province in the south of Turkey. T-test, ANOVA, correlation analysis and SEM analysis were applied to the findings obtained from the research. According to the results of the research, there are significant differences between the variables. In addition, relations between the variables were determined and SEM was established.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Regarding the First Research Questionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Anahtar Yetkinlikler Becerilerinin İncelenmesi

Karatepe

Akay

2023

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, it was observed that the MT levels of female students in both groups were higher than male students. Akçakın and Kaya (2020) examined the variation of mathematical thinking styles according to gender in their study. Researchers stated that female students have more analytical thinking style than male students, and male students have more visual thinking style than female students.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of the mathematical thinking levels of gifted and non-gifted students

Zübeyde

2023

Educ. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the mathematical thinking levels of gifted and non-gifted students and to compare them according to some variables. In this study, screening model was used from quantitative research methods. The study group of the study consists of 194 gifted students and 168 non-gifted students studying in grades 5-8 in a province in the southern region of Turkey in the 2022 to 2023 academic year. According to the results of the research, it was found that the mathematical thinking levels of gifted students were higher than their non-gifted peers. In addition, the mathematical thinking levels of gifted students showed a significant difference compared to grade level. This does not apply to non-gifted students. It was found that the mathematical thinking levels of female students were higher than the mathematical thinking levels of male students in gifted and non-gifted student groups, but this difference was not statistically significant. In addition, it was seen that the success grade of the mathematics course made a significant difference on the mathematical thinking level of both the gifted and non-gifted student groups.

show abstract

“…These studies can be classified into three major groups. First, the study on the development of instruments to measure analytical thinking skills by Akcakin & Kaya (2020), Aksu & Eser (2020), Ad'hiya & Laksono (2018), and Thaneerananon, et al (2016. Second, the study related to the characteristics of an analytical thinker by Ferri (2010) and Shahbari (2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%