2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-8176-4481-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Intrinsic Dimension and Entropy of High-Dimensional Shape Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional degrees of freedoms could be the length of the main line, the angle between the main line and the upper line and the length of the upper line. The intrinsic dimensions of digit 2 and 3 were estimated in (Costa & Hero, 2004) for a subsample of size 1000 as 13 and 12 respectively 12 and 11 depending on the way they build their neighborhood graph. We estimate an intrinsic dimension of 13 for digit 2 and 14 for digit 3.…”
Section: The Artificial 1-digit Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional degrees of freedoms could be the length of the main line, the angle between the main line and the upper line and the length of the upper line. The intrinsic dimensions of digit 2 and 3 were estimated in (Costa & Hero, 2004) for a subsample of size 1000 as 13 and 12 respectively 12 and 11 depending on the way they build their neighborhood graph. We estimate an intrinsic dimension of 13 for digit 2 and 14 for digit 3.…”
Section: The Artificial 1-digit Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 4 in [3] ensures that geodetic distances in the infinitesimal ball converge to Euclidean distances with probability 1; moreover, recalling the result reported in Theorem 1, it is possible to notice that, for x i =x, the quantities ρ(x i ) are samples drawn from the pdf reported in Equation (1), where the parameter k is known and the parameter d must be estimated. A simple approach for the estimation of d is the maximization of the log-likelihood function: …”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Approachesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This technique is based on the observation that the length function of such graphs, that is the sum of arc weights on the minimal graph that spans all the points in the dataset, is strongly dependent on d. The authors test their method by adopting either the geodesic minimal spanning tree (GMST [4]), where the arc weights are the geodetic distances computed through the ISOMAP [23] algorithm, or the kNN-graph (kNNG [5]), where the arc weights are based on the Euclidean distances, thus requiring a lower computational cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data sets are often modeled as samples from a probability measure µ concentrated on or around a low-dimensional set embedded in high dimensional space (see for example [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]). While it is often assumed that such low-dimensional sets are in fact low-dimensional smooth manifolds, empirical evidence suggests that this is only a idealized situation: these sets may be not be smooth [8,4,9], they may have a non-differentiable metric tensor, self-intersections, and changes in dimensionality (see [10,11,12,13] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%