1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112085000209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining modes and fractal dimension of turbulent flows

Abstract: Research on the abstract properties of the Navier–Stokes equations in three dimensions has cast a new light on the time-asymptotic approximate solutions of those equations. Here heuristic arguments, based on the rigorous results of that research, are used to show the intimate relationship between the sufficient number of degrees of freedom describing fluid flow and the bound on the fractal dimension of the Navier–Stokes attractor. In particular it is demonstrated how the conventional estimate of the number of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
110
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global regularity of these equations on a periodic box and subsequence convergence to Leray solutions of the NSE as α 1 → 0 (and α 0 → 1) is established in [15], as well as estimates on the Hausdorff and fractal dimension of the attractor. In particular it is shown in [15] 3 for a generic constant c. The power on l 0 /l matches the Landau-Lifschitz prediction and also matches the estimates on invariant sets bounded in V = P H 1 (Ω) for weak solutions of the 3D NSE as shown in [11][12][13]. There is also no potential to "absorb" the growth term (1/α 1 ) 3/2 , so the estimate simply grows without bound as α 1 → 0.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global regularity of these equations on a periodic box and subsequence convergence to Leray solutions of the NSE as α 1 → 0 (and α 0 → 1) is established in [15], as well as estimates on the Hausdorff and fractal dimension of the attractor. In particular it is shown in [15] 3 for a generic constant c. The power on l 0 /l matches the Landau-Lifschitz prediction and also matches the estimates on invariant sets bounded in V = P H 1 (Ω) for weak solutions of the 3D NSE as shown in [11][12][13]. There is also no potential to "absorb" the growth term (1/α 1 ) 3/2 , so the estimate simply grows without bound as α 1 → 0.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…[11,14,31,32]), first developed for the 2D NSE, that relies both on trace formulas and the Lieb-Thirring inequality (LTI), the latter being first used in this context in [31,32]. Related results for weak solutions of the NSE in 3D can be found in [4,12,13,29]. In [15] for strong solutions of the model known variously as the NS-α, 3D LANS-α, or 3D Camassa-Holm equations, the CFT/LTI methodology is applied toward estimating attractor dimension and in the conclusion of this paper we will compare the attractor estimates developed in [15] with (1.10a-1.10d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In various works [6,8,9,19,24], several estimates on the dimension of global attractor of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations were derived, although it is still an outstanding open problem to show that it exists. In particular, it has been shown that if A ⊂ H is invariant and bounded in V, then dim H A ≤ cG 3/2 .…”
Section: Remark 54mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is relevant to the widely held view that chaotic, dissipative, dynamical systems are eventually drawn into a strange attractor which is of relatively low dimension [14,15]. Indeed a number of fluid experiments support this view [16,17,18], Theoretical estimates also support this view but greatly overestimate the dimension and alas provide no clue to the parametrization of the attractor [19]. While we do not confront this issue directly it will be seen that a practical, and in a sense optimal, description of the attractor is furnished.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%