2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Objective Parameters to Assess Gait Quality in Franches-Montagnes Horses for Ground Coverage and Over-Tracking - Part 1: At Walk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deciding which measurement is better for a particular joint is complicated in the case when h 2 and ICC are not in lockstep. Another way to choose the most informative landmark placement might be to compare the joint angles with kinematic parameters, to assess whether one set of landmarks is a better predictor for movements associated with gait quality traits such as hind limb protraction [ 33 ], i.e., whether a certain joint angle measurement is more functionally relevant. Considering the low amount of additional effort involved in placing the supplementary landmarks, we currently recommend assessing the ICC and h 2 of both types of joint angle measurements in other breeds using the two landmark settings, in order to optimise the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deciding which measurement is better for a particular joint is complicated in the case when h 2 and ICC are not in lockstep. Another way to choose the most informative landmark placement might be to compare the joint angles with kinematic parameters, to assess whether one set of landmarks is a better predictor for movements associated with gait quality traits such as hind limb protraction [ 33 ], i.e., whether a certain joint angle measurement is more functionally relevant. Considering the low amount of additional effort involved in placing the supplementary landmarks, we currently recommend assessing the ICC and h 2 of both types of joint angle measurements in other breeds using the two landmark settings, in order to optimise the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher extreme showed a horse shape with a roach back and sloping croup, as opposed to the lowest extreme of a sway-backed horse (hyperlordosis) with a horizontal croup, although we have no information on actual clinical signs in this dataset of horse photographs. Follow-up studies should include radiographs of genotyped horses with extreme roach back or sway back, as well as an objective movement analysis of homozygous horses from both genotype groups to determine whether the conformation would affect the gait quality of the horse, as stride length and over-tracking distance are highly dependent on the movement of the pelvis at walk, and to a lesser extent, at trot 43,44 . Previous genomic research investigated juvenile onset lordosis in the American Saddlebred horse identifying a large haplotype on ECA20 potentially involving the TRERF1, TAF8 and C6orf132 genes 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher extreme showed a horse shape with a roach back and sloping croup, as opposed to the lowest extreme of a sway backed horse (hyperlordosis) with a horizontal croup, although we have no information on actual clinical signs in this dataset of horse photographs. Follow-up studies should include radiographs of genotyped horses with extreme roach back or sway back, as well as an objective movement analysis of homozygous horses from both genotype groups to determine whether the conformation would affect the gait quality of the horse, as stride length and over-tracking distance are highly dependent on the movement of the pelvis at walk, and to a lesser extent, at trot 47 , 48 . Previous genomic research investigated juvenile onset lordosis in the American Saddlebred horse identifying a large haplotype on ECA20 potentially involving the TRERF1 , TAF8 and C6orf132 genes 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%