2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining prognosis after spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no standard functional outcome measure was used in their assessment. Stability of neurological outcome was reached within a year from the time of the injury, and even less for complete injuries (Vazquez et al, 2008).…”
Section: Injury-related Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no standard functional outcome measure was used in their assessment. Stability of neurological outcome was reached within a year from the time of the injury, and even less for complete injuries (Vazquez et al, 2008).…”
Section: Injury-related Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The rate of improvement was least in ASIA A patients; 94% of them remained complete upon discharge and none of them was functional. In contrast, incomplete injury patients experienced better recovery; one third of ASIA B had neurological recovery and 33.3% of them were functional, 76.4% of ASIA C improved neurologically, with all of them functional, and all ASIA D were functional upon discharge (Vazquez et al, 2008). However, no standard functional outcome measure was used in their assessment.…”
Section: Injury-related Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AIS has strong prognostic value that has been shown across various functional outcomes [18,19,21]. van Middendorp et al [18] reported excellent predictive values of the AIS scores regarding predicting independent ambulation at 1 year.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of an AIS Grade A injury after resolution of spinal shock has a remarkably strong-albeit unfortunatecorrelation with future inability to regain functional motor capacity [6,21]. Kirshblum et al [6] presented a longitudinal study of patients with spinal cord injury and found that only 2.1% patients with a complete injury improved to having an incomplete injury by 5 years.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following SCI, factors affecting neurologic recovery are etiology and severity of injury. Neurological improvement is more common in incomplete injuries (8) . Marino et al (10) found that %66.7 of the patients with grade C had progressed to grade D and only %3.8 of the patients with grade C had progressed to grade E in 1 year.…”
Section: Dıscussıonmentioning
confidence: 99%