2002
DOI: 10.1038/416039a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the composition of the Earth

Abstract: A long-standing question in the planetary sciences asks what the Earth is made of. For historical reasons, volatile-depleted primitive materials similar to current chondritic meteorites were long considered to provide the 'building blocks' of the terrestrial planets. But material from the Earth, Mars, comets and various meteorites have Mg/Si and Al/Si ratios, oxygen-isotope ratios, osmium-isotope ratios and D/H, Ar/H2O and Kr/Xe ratios such that no primitive material similar to the Earth's mantle is currently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
247
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
247
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on modeling and observations of the heliocentric distance for the onset of cometary activity, the snow line for H 2 O in the solar system today is around 2.0-2.5 AU (e.g., at 160K T 200K approximately;see review in Encrenaz, 2008). The water snow line was likely to have been farther out (perhaps near 4-5 AU, near where proto-Jupiter formed) in the early solar system (e.g., Stevenson and Lunine, 1988;Encrenaz, 2008), and of course there are different, similarly more distant "snow" lines for molecular disk volatiles like CH 4 , NH 3 , CO 2 , and others that have lower condensation temperatures based on their saturation vapor pressure behavior.…”
Section: The Snow Linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on modeling and observations of the heliocentric distance for the onset of cometary activity, the snow line for H 2 O in the solar system today is around 2.0-2.5 AU (e.g., at 160K T 200K approximately;see review in Encrenaz, 2008). The water snow line was likely to have been farther out (perhaps near 4-5 AU, near where proto-Jupiter formed) in the early solar system (e.g., Stevenson and Lunine, 1988;Encrenaz, 2008), and of course there are different, similarly more distant "snow" lines for molecular disk volatiles like CH 4 , NH 3 , CO 2 , and others that have lower condensation temperatures based on their saturation vapor pressure behavior.…”
Section: The Snow Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the ubiquity of water in general, this implies that water ice is likely to be the dominant volatile in a typical solar nebula, and that the snow line marks an important boundary in a typical solar system, beyond which significantly greater abundances of solids (ice) are available for planetary accretion and growth (e.g., Stevenson and Lunine, 1988;Encrenaz, 2008). The concept of a hard "line" beyond which water condenses is likely to be unrealistic, however, as local, synopticscale variations in nebular conditions (e.g., pressure, temperature, density, composition, grain size) almost certainly would have resulted in the water ice condensation occurring within a more fuzzy zone rather than at a specific, narrow boundary.…”
Section: The Snow Linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence that the inner planets of the Solar System are formed from relatively narrow accretion zones (Drake and Righter, 2002;Taylor et al, 2003) suggests that we may not expect uranium/thorium concentrations to be at Earth levels in all rocky planets, although their budget on Venus may be similar to that on Earth (Taylor, 1999). The lack of plate tectonics on Mars except perhaps in infancy (Kerr, 1998;Nimmo and Stevenson, 2000), and on other terrestrial planets, limits the potential for crustal differentiation.…”
Section: The Potential For Irradiation On Other Rocky Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%