1999
DOI: 10.1159/000331346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Cost-Effectiveness of Mass Screening for Cervical Cancer Using Common Analytic Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost-effectiveness of pravastatin therapy should be compared with that of currently accepted therapeutic or diagnostic interventions. The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio of screening in Japan has been estimated to be 0.7 million yen/life expectancy (LE) in men and 1.8 million yen/LE in women for gastric cancer [42], 2 million yen/LE for colorectal cancer [43], 3.2 million yen/QALY for physical examination and mammography to detect breast cancer [44], 0.88 yen/QALY for Pap smears to detect cervical cancer [45], and 5.4 million yen/ QALY for screening of osteoporosis [46], all adjusted to 2002 prices. These screening programs have been already accepted by Japanese society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness of pravastatin therapy should be compared with that of currently accepted therapeutic or diagnostic interventions. The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio of screening in Japan has been estimated to be 0.7 million yen/life expectancy (LE) in men and 1.8 million yen/LE in women for gastric cancer [42], 2 million yen/LE for colorectal cancer [43], 3.2 million yen/QALY for physical examination and mammography to detect breast cancer [44], 0.88 yen/QALY for Pap smears to detect cervical cancer [45], and 5.4 million yen/ QALY for screening of osteoporosis [46], all adjusted to 2002 prices. These screening programs have been already accepted by Japanese society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Setting up a screen- ing program and follow-up policies connected with screening requires the inclusion of all age groups. It is useful to include colposcopy in the prevention program, especially in the case of discordant results between examinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%