2001
DOI: 10.1159/000327857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Cervical Carcinoma in the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reasons for the failure of these programmes. One major reason includes cervical screening programmes that were organized on a small scale with deficient design, poor co‐ordination and efficiency 16–20 . Screening that is opportunistic and isolated with no systematic recruitment is another reason for failure as in the tendency to screen young urban women at the expense of rural and older women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several reasons for the failure of these programmes. One major reason includes cervical screening programmes that were organized on a small scale with deficient design, poor co‐ordination and efficiency 16–20 . Screening that is opportunistic and isolated with no systematic recruitment is another reason for failure as in the tendency to screen young urban women at the expense of rural and older women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major reason includes cervical screening programmes that were organized on a small scale with deficient design, poor co-ordination and efficiency. [16][17][18][19][20] Screening that is opportunistic and isolated with no systematic recruitment is another reason for failure as in the tendency to screen young urban women at the expense of rural and older women. Ignorance, apathy, poor economic status of the target women; lack of interest and work overload on the part of healthcare workers are further contributing factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of studies using nucleolar quantitative characteristics to analyze effects of different Ž factors on genetic apparatus of a cell Calin and Dragomir, 1980;Fiskesjo, 1983;Popp and Wachtler, 1983;Kobilkova et al, 1985;Khvoles and Chernyaev, . 1988;Arkhipchuk, 1995a;Olszewska et al, 1997 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%