2011
DOI: 10.1021/je1011532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Gibbs Energies of Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions of Proton-Accepting Solutes in Aqueous Solutions from Thermodynamic Data at 298 K with Regard to the Hydrophobic Effect

Abstract: Reaction rate and equilibrium constants in aqueous solutions are affected by the strength of hydrogen bonds formed between dissolved species and water molecules. Thermodynamic functions of hydrogen bonding with bulk water cannot be measured directly using spectroscopic methods, but the contribution of hydrogen-bonding processes to the thermodynamic functions of hydration may be determined using some model of aqueous solutions. We determined the Gibbs energies of hydrogenbonding interactions in water for variou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of Δ G HB as a function of temperature are plotted in Figure . In Table our results are compared at 298.15 K with the values proposed by Sedov et al, which are based on a correlation involving experimental quantities such as Gibbs free energy of solvation. The values show that this model has a fair agreement with the experimentally obtained Gibbs energy of hydrogen bonding.…”
Section: Gibbs Energy Of Hydrogen Bondingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The values of Δ G HB as a function of temperature are plotted in Figure . In Table our results are compared at 298.15 K with the values proposed by Sedov et al, which are based on a correlation involving experimental quantities such as Gibbs free energy of solvation. The values show that this model has a fair agreement with the experimentally obtained Gibbs energy of hydrogen bonding.…”
Section: Gibbs Energy Of Hydrogen Bondingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We see that once K eq , z AB , and z C are specified, all of the derivative activities of the reaction products are uniquely determined. However, the constraint of incompressibility further renders only one of the two fundamental activities independent, so we make the simple choice of the arbitrary constant, z C and define Keq=normalenormalxnormalptrue(ΔGnormalHnormalbnormalonormalnnormaldnormalsnormalRnormalTtrue), where ΔGnormalHnormalbnormalonormalnnormaldnormals=5.0 normalknormalJ/normalmnormalonormall approximately from the general ether oxygen and hydrogen from carboxylic acid, so that the binding of C beads toward B is preferential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic traces of reactions with known amounts of added water (5, 10, and 15 equiv) to anhydrous 2-PPA were best fit to the mechanism described by eqs and 2 using Reactlab multiwavelength global analysis, yielding rate constants k 1 = 6 ± 2 M –1 s –1 and k 2 = 0.83 ± 0.05 M –1 s –1 and K eq = 24 ± 5 M –1 . This mechanistic model (with A reasonably proposed to be a hydrogen-bonded PPA/H 2 O adduct) was then used to fit all data for [wet 2-PPA] 0 (5−200 mM; Figure S9), using an assumed [H 2 O] 0 , which resulted in a similarly fitted K eq (6.7 ± 0.3 M –1 ; Figure S16 and Table S3). Attempts to fit the kinetic data using a nucleophilic attack model without substrate activation (eq S1) were unsuccessful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%