2022
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202200364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Gibbs Energy Contributions of Ion and Electron Transfer for Proton Insertion in ϵ‐MnO2

Abstract: Electrochemically active ϵ‐MnO2 and ɣ‐MnO2 as tunnel‐type host‐guest structures have been extensively studied by crystallography and electrochemical techniques for application in battery cathode materials. However, the Gibbs energies of the underlying ion and electron transfer processes across the electrode interfaces have not yet been determined. Here we report for the first time these data for ϵ‐MnO2. This was possible by measuring the mid‐peak potentials in cyclic voltammetry and the open‐circuit potentials… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) can be represented as the sum of the process of ion insertion described by Eq. (6) and a process of electron transfer non‐mediated by electrolyte cations, [34–37] {normalMxnormalKaCubFec[FeII(CN)6]x+}normals+xe-{normalMxnormalKaCubFec[FeII(CN)6]}normals $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr \{{\rm M}{_{x}}{\rm K}{_{a}}{\rm Cu}{_{b}}{\rm Fe}{_{c}}[{\rm Fe}{^{{\rm II}}}({\rm CN}){_{6}}]{^{x+}}\}{_{{\rm s}}}+x{\rm e}{^{- }}{\stackrel{{\leftarrow}} {{\rightarrow} } }\hfill\cr \{{\rm M}{_{x}}{\rm K}{_{a}}{\rm Cu}{_{b}}{\rm Fe}{_{c}}[{\rm Fe}{^{{\rm II}}}({\rm CN}){_{6}}]\}{_{{\rm s}}}\hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(4) can be represented as the sum of the process of ion insertion described by Eq. (6) and a process of electron transfer non‐mediated by electrolyte cations, [34–37] {normalMxnormalKaCubFec[FeII(CN)6]x+}normals+xe-{normalMxnormalKaCubFec[FeII(CN)6]}normals $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr \{{\rm M}{_{x}}{\rm K}{_{a}}{\rm Cu}{_{b}}{\rm Fe}{_{c}}[{\rm Fe}{^{{\rm II}}}({\rm CN}){_{6}}]{^{x+}}\}{_{{\rm s}}}+x{\rm e}{^{- }}{\stackrel{{\leftarrow}} {{\rightarrow} } }\hfill\cr \{{\rm M}{_{x}}{\rm K}{_{a}}{\rm Cu}{_{b}}{\rm Fe}{_{c}}[{\rm Fe}{^{{\rm II}}}({\rm CN}){_{6}}]\}{_{{\rm s}}}\hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the mid‐peak potential, the activities of solid phases cancel so that the difference between the mid‐peak potential recorded in CV measurements and the OCP should be constant and independent on the concentration of M + in the electrolyte. In turn, assuming that the solid‐state transformations are topotactic, one can take, as in the case of ϵ‐MnO 2 , [37] E ° Mox = E ° Mrd . Then, the electronic contribution, given by E II , can be separated from the ionic one, given by E OCP , taking, EII=normalEmp-EOCP=EnormalInormalo-EOCPnormalo $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr E_{{\rm{II}}} = {\rm{E}}_{{\rm{mp}}} - E_{{\rm{OCP}}} = E^{\rm{o}} _{\rm{I}} - E^{\rm{o}} _{{\rm{OCP}}} \hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations