Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3035918.3064044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Impact Regions of Competing Options in Preference Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions cannot restrain user preferences, because score ranking depends only on the direction of w instead of its magnitude [19]; but they allow w to drop one weight (i.e., w d = 1 − d−1 i=1 w i ), thereby mapping the domain of w to a (d − 1)-dimensional space, named the preference domain. This dimensionality reduction is critical [20], since the dimensionality directly determines the processing time of the costliest operations in our techniques. In the following, w refers to the (d−1)-dimensional form of the weight vector.…”
Section: Score Of Multi-attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conditions cannot restrain user preferences, because score ranking depends only on the direction of w instead of its magnitude [19]; but they allow w to drop one weight (i.e., w d = 1 − d−1 i=1 w i ), thereby mapping the domain of w to a (d − 1)-dimensional space, named the preference domain. This dimensionality reduction is critical [20], since the dimensionality directly determines the processing time of the costliest operations in our techniques. In the following, w refers to the (d−1)-dimensional form of the weight vector.…”
Section: Score Of Multi-attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-preference recommendation and multi-criteria decision making based on top-k query processing has become a hot topic and has been studied extensively in the last two decades. In the context of multi criteria top-k query processing, computational geometry driven top-k query processing models have gained a lot of interest in recent years [11,12,13,14,15] and could be successfully adapted to several variants of top-k queries in multi-criteria settings [12]. The principal idea of the above mentioned line of work is to translate object domination according to multi-criteria preferences into hyperplane bisection of the multidimensional preference space.…”
Section: Multi-preference Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work also supports time series data [32] or avoids false discoveries of statistical patterns [44] during interactive data exploration. Finding best database objects based on user preferences [40] assumes a numeric weight per database attribute, which is di↵erent from the active learning approach to discover the user interest on the fly. Query by Example is a specific framework for data exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%