2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Minimal Clinical Important Difference for Medication Quantification Scale III and Morphine Milligram Equivalents in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Abstract: The Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS) is a tool to represent the negative impact of medication. A reduction in medication can serve as an indicator to evaluate treatment success. However, no cut-off value has yet been determined to evaluate whether a decrease in medication is clinically relevant. Therefore, the objective is to estimate the thresholds for the MQS and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) that best identify a clinically relevant important improvement for patients. Data from the Discover … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important issue in light of the ongoing opioid epidemic is the reduction in medication use. Therefore, a third definition of responder was created based on reaching the minimal clinical important difference of the MQS [ 23 ]. With this outcome, logistic regression and LDA resulted in an accuracy of more than 80% on the validation set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important issue in light of the ongoing opioid epidemic is the reduction in medication use. Therefore, a third definition of responder was created based on reaching the minimal clinical important difference of the MQS [ 23 ]. With this outcome, logistic regression and LDA resulted in an accuracy of more than 80% on the validation set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the outcome variable was also defined as a patient who has 30% pain relief, which is in line with the minimal clinical important difference for pain intensity [ 22 ]. Finally, the outcome variable was also defined as a patient who has at least 41.2% reduction in pain medication use, which is in line with the minimal clinical important difference for medication use in this population [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 28.2% change in MME/day has been suggested as a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) [19]. Based on our data, MME/day dropped 27.0%, 39.4%, and 24.5% in all patients, patients below 15 MME/day, and patients above 15 MME/day, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A 28.2% change in MME/day has been suggested as a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) [ 15 ]. Based on our data, MME/day dropped at a level that would meet the criteria for MCID.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%