2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the minimal number of specimens for laboratory testing of rock properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of specimens in a group, coefficient of variation, confidence interval, and a targeted precision index were used in an algorithm that defined the minimum number. Gill et al (2005) concluded that the smallest sample size varies for different rocks and it is difficult to determine the sample size required to obtain certain confidence interval without actual testing. Gill et al's (2005) results are in general agreement with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The number of specimens in a group, coefficient of variation, confidence interval, and a targeted precision index were used in an algorithm that defined the minimum number. Gill et al (2005) concluded that the smallest sample size varies for different rocks and it is difficult to determine the sample size required to obtain certain confidence interval without actual testing. Gill et al's (2005) results are in general agreement with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although these tests were performed on one rock type at 99.7% confidence interval, 15-25 samples would give a less than 15% deviation from the mean at a 95% confidence interval. Gill et al (2005) used a rigorous statistical procedure to determine the number of samples to test for mechanical properties of rocks. The number of specimens in a group, coefficient of variation, confidence interval, and a targeted precision index were used in an algorithm that defined the minimum number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to a detailed statistical analysis performed by Gill et al (2005), it is impossible to determine the minimum sample number for laboratory testing of rock properties without prior testing. Numerous testing agencies have established their own standards for ascertaining the minimum number of samples required to test for unconfined compressive strength.…”
Section: Number Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%