2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Surface Potential of Charged Aqueous Interfaces Using Nonlinear Optical Methods

Abstract: Second-order nonlinear optical techniques have recently been established as sensitive probes of charged interfaces through the nonlinear susceptibility of water and provide an attractive route to elucidate the surface potential. We discuss methods that have been proposed using electronic second-harmonic generation and vibrational sum-frequency generation. A detailed comparison is provided, using a unified notation and including a discussion of the assumptions that are either convenient or necessary in order to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of g 3 is determined from the interfacial potential, which we approximate by the ζ potential, and accounts for optical interference in the diffuse layer that occurs at low ionic strength. 49,50 This χ (3) g 3 term represents the contribution of H 2 O or HOD molecules aligned or polarized by the interfacial potential, which is analogous to the diffuse layer component of the EDL.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of g 3 is determined from the interfacial potential, which we approximate by the ζ potential, and accounts for optical interference in the diffuse layer that occurs at low ionic strength. 49,50 This χ (3) g 3 term represents the contribution of H 2 O or HOD molecules aligned or polarized by the interfacial potential, which is analogous to the diffuse layer component of the EDL.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ma and Geiger employed the SHG phase and amplitude measurements through heterodyne-detected SHG to examine how ionic charge affects the structure and surface potential at SiO 2 interfaces (Figure ), and how dynamics differ in different regions of the double layer . The way the surface potential can be extracted from SHG experiments was also discussed by Hore and co-workers . Second-harmonic scattering (an incoherent version of SHG) was used to study ion adsorption at the surface of SiO 2 and TiO 2 particles .…”
Section: Hard Materials and Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The way the surface potential can be extracted from SHG experiments was also discussed by Hore and coworkers. 17 Second-harmonic scattering (an incoherent version of SHG) was used to study ion adsorption at the surface of SiO 2 and TiO 2 particles. 18 This technique was also used by Gonella and co-workers to investigate protein adsorption onto the surfaces of nanoparticles.…”
Section: ■ Hard Materials and Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 𝑔 3 is determined from the interfacial potential, which we approximate by the zeta potential, and accounts for optical interference in the diffuse layer that occurs at low ionic strength. 46,47 This 𝜒 (3) 𝑔 3 term represents the contribution of H2O or HOD molecules aligned or polarized by the interfacial potential, which is analogous to the diffuse layer component of the EDL.…”
Section: Homodyne Vsfg and Zeta Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%