2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.41625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Vacuum-Arc Thruster Performance Using a Cathode-Spot Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sheath thickness (not including the pre-sheath) is on the scale of Debye length [12], and therefore, for the present study, the sheath thickness is taken as Debye length l = ( ) d . D The electric field E c thus observed is of the order of -10 V m 9 1 equivalent to the field observed by Messaad et al [16] and Lun et al [17].…”
Section: Sheath Modelsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sheath thickness (not including the pre-sheath) is on the scale of Debye length [12], and therefore, for the present study, the sheath thickness is taken as Debye length l = ( ) d . D The electric field E c thus observed is of the order of -10 V m 9 1 equivalent to the field observed by Messaad et al [16] and Lun et al [17].…”
Section: Sheath Modelsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…A simplified sheath model, inspired by previous work of Fujita et al [14], Lu et al [12], Messaad et al [16], and Lun et al [17], is considered in this study. The model presented in the literature [12,14,16] assumes the net heat flux to the cathode to be zero.…”
Section: Sheath Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study of physical factors (such as the value of the anode-cathode gap, the arcing pulse energy, the presence of a magnetic field, and the choice of cathode material and electrode geometry [10,13,15,16,25]), which greatly affect the process of re-deposition of the film and thus thruster performance and lifetime, seems to be highly relevant. The currently widespread VAT geometries are coaxial, tubular and planar [26,27]; in the authors' opinion, a planar geometry is the most attractive from the point of view of studying triggering features, due to the following considerations. A planar geometry is machinable, convenient and practical for experiments: it allows one to easily vary the inter-electrode gap and thus to investigate the effect of the value of this gap, as well as one specific component of the magnetic field (say, that parallel to the surface of the inter-electrode film), on the thruster lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%