Deterministic Role of CEA and MSI Status in Predicting Outcome of CRC Patients: a Perspective Study Amongst Hospital Attending Eastern Indian Populations

Song

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology detects specific mutations that can provide treatment opportunities for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We included 145 CRC patients who underwent surgery. We analyzed the mutation frequencies of common actionable genes and their association with clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes using targeted NGS. Approximately 97.9% (142) of patients showed somatic mutations. Frequent mutations were observed in TP53 (70%), APC (60%), and KRAS (49%). TP53 mutations were significantly linked to higher overall stage (p = 0.038) and lower disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.039). ATM mutation was significantly associated with higher tumor stage (p = 0.012) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.041). Stage 3 and 4 patients with ATM mutations (p = 0.023) had shorter OS, and FBXW7 mutation was significantly associated with shorter DFS (p = 0.002). However, the OS of patients with or without TP53, RAS, APC, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutations did not differ significantly (p = 0.59, 0.72, 0.059, 0.25, and 0.12, respectively). Similarly, the DFS between patients with RAS, APC, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutations and those with wild-type were not statistically different (p = 0.3, 0.79, 0.13, and 0.59, respectively). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ATM mutation was an independent biomarker for poor prognosis of OS (p = 0.043). A comprehensive analysis of the molecular markers for CRC can provide insights into the mechanisms underlying disease progression and help optimize a personalized therapy.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Enhancing the landscape of colorectal cancer using targeted deep sequencing

Song

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

“…In our cohort, KRAS-mutated tumors were more frequently found in the MSS group, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [24,33]. A previous study by Koyel et al reported a strong association between high CEA (≥4) and MSI-H, which is also reflected in the present study [34].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Enhancing the Landscape of Colorectal Cancer Using Targeted Deep Sequencing

Song

et al. 2020

Preprint

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology detects specific mutations that can provide treatment opportunities for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We included 145 CRC patients who underwent surgery. We analyzed the mutation frequencies of common actionable genes and their association with clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes using targeted NGS. Approximately 97.9% (142) of patients showed somatic mutations. Frequent mutations were observed in TP53 (70%), KRAS (49%), and APC (47%). TP53 mutations were significantly linked to higher overall stage (p=0.038) and lower disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.039). ATM mutation was significantly associated with higher tumor stage (p=0.012) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.041). Stage 3 and 4 patients with ATM mutations (p=0.023) had shorter OS, and FBXW7 mutation was significantly associated with shorter DFS (p=0.002). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ATM mutation was an independent biomarker for poor prognosis of OS (p=0.022). TP53 and FBXW7 mutations are independent biomarkers for poor prognosis of DFS (p=0.042 and 0.030, respectively). A comprehensive analysis of the molecular markers for CRC can provide insights into the mechanisms underlying disease progression and help optimize a personalized therapy.

“…Compared to other potential predictive markers, measurement of serum CEA levels is inexpensive, standardized, widely used and easily performed [18]. In recent years, many studies have focused on the predictive value of CEA levels in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy [19][20][21]. Most studies showed that low pre-treatment CEA levels are associated with a good patients' outcome [21], but only very few data are available on the predictive role of CEA measurements in CRLM patients undergoing curatively intended liver surgery, supporting further analyses addressing this question in large and well-characterized cohorts of patients [22,23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Circulating Biomarkers for Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

et al. 2021

Surgical tumor resection has evolved as a potentially curative therapy for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, disease recurrence is common and the available preoperative stratification strategies are often imprecise to identify the ideal candidates for surgical treatment, resulting in a postoperative 5-year survival rate below 50%. Data on the prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9 and other common laboratory parameters after CRLM resection are scarce and partly inconclusive. Here, we analyzed the prognostic potential of circulating CEA and CA19-9 in comparison to other standard laboratory markers in resectable CRLM patients. Serum levels of tumor markers and other laboratory parameters were analyzed in 125 patients with CRLM undergoing tumor resection at a tertiary referral center. Results were correlated with clinical data and outcome. Both tumor markers were significantly elevated in CRLM patients compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, elevated levels of CEA, CA19-9 and C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with an unfavorable prognosis after CRLM resection in Kaplan–Meier curve analysis. However, only CEA and not CA19-9 or CRP serum levels were an independent prognostic marker in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Our data demonstrate that circulating levels of CEA rather than CA19-9 might be a valuable addition to the existing preoperative stratification algorithms to identify patients with a poor prognosis after CRLM resection.