2002
DOI: 10.1080/13632460209350432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment: An Exaggerated and Obstructive Dichotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the selection -and indeed the interpretation -of a truncation level for ground motions is just as unavoidable an issue for deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA) as it is for PSHA. In both cases, ε max appears to be the 'missing piece' of the puzzle (Bommer, 2002).…”
Section: Selection Of Truncation Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the selection -and indeed the interpretation -of a truncation level for ground motions is just as unavoidable an issue for deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA) as it is for PSHA. In both cases, ε max appears to be the 'missing piece' of the puzzle (Bommer, 2002).…”
Section: Selection Of Truncation Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, for natural events such as earthquakes, floods, landslides or volcanic eruptions, a probabilistic hazard can be defined, e.g. see [22][23][24][25]. However, there are fields for which establishing a probabilistic hazard is still complex mostly due to a lack of adequate data [26][27][28].…”
Section: Outlook Of Existing Risk Analysis Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of this section we should further add that although it may be difficult to establish a seismic hazard analysis approach that will be appropriate for all regions and all application areas [22], it is obvious that the probabilistic and the deterministic seismic hazard analysis do not exclude each other. In fact, these two approaches have shown to be inherently complementary [2,3,23], if the probabilistic analysis is allowed to guide the choice of the maximum credible and/or the hazard-consistent seismic events, and if the DSHA estimates are used to refine the probabilistic ones, or to asses the economic losses during the "worst-scenario" earthquakes, or, e.g., to educate the public about the earthquake hazards in the considered region.…”
Section: Probabilistic Vs Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%